On Friday, 18 December 2015 09:23:55 UTC, Martin R wrote: > > > > Am Freitag, 18. Dezember 2015 09:39:57 UTC+1 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >> >> >> >> On Friday, 18 December 2015 08:33:05 UTC, Martin R wrote: >>> >>> Actually, I propose to delete all code from sage, because it doesn't >>> work in all circumstances. >>> >>> It might be useful for some people (not all that many), but we are >>> actually doing them a favour because we save them from using software in >>> circumstances where it doesn't apply. Thus, by deleting sage, we will >>> contribute to their happiness. >>> >>> Moreover, we are going to save a lot of disk space and cpu time, that >>> will then find much better use! >>> >>> Martin >>> >>> PS: more seriously: if you don't know what to_permutation does, why >>> would you use it? >>> >> WTF? Permutation on a set is a just a bijection, isn't it? >> And whoever coded and reviewed this crap cannot even tell 0 from a >> negative number, you know: >> >> sage: s=SetPartition([[0,1,2],[3,4]]) >> sage: s.to_permutation() >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ValueError Traceback (most recent call >> last) >> ... >> ValueError: All elements should be strictly positive integers, and I just >> found a negative one. >> >> >> Indeed, as I said, we should get rid of the Permutation class, because it > is buggy. >
ever heard of *bug fixing*, no? > > Martin > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
