On Thursday, December 31, 2015 at 2:43:56 AM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: > > Regardless of how "useful" or awesome the Jupyter notebook is and how many > people in scientific computing are using it, there is a substantial > ecosystem now designed around the Sage notebook proper >
And we are not removing it for all the legacy reasons that you listed. This thread is about what format new notebooks are supposed to be. Anybody who prefers SageNB can still use SageNB But the fact is: Its unmaintained/-able, and the longer we wait the more painful it'll be to switch. How is waiting another year going to help? Because by then there will be another book explaining how to use SageNB? Do you think the book author is going to be happy that we never made it clear that SageNB is on the way out? SageNB is an evolutionary dead end, and the only question is how deep into that hole do we want to go. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
