> > WHY THE HELL IS SO MUCH MONEY AND TIME SPENT ON DOING IT IN STEAD OF 
> > AUTOMATING IT AWAY!!!!! 
>
> I think you are misunderstanding what kind of boring work we are talking 
> about. For example, porting Sage to Python 3 is certainly boring but 
> cannot be fully automated. There are tools which can partially automate 
> the Python 3 conversion, but those cannot cope with some fundamental 
> things like the disappearance of __cmp__. 
>

Creating high-quality documentation (beyond our hit-or-miss reference 
manual) and textbooks and so forth is not automatable.  Sorry.  My life as 
an educator would be SO much easier if it were :( 

On a different note, I think that the existence of RStudio has definitely 
contributed to R's popularity in certain circles, though I find much of its 
documentation, woefully, worse than that of Sage, or even of some man 
pages... Microsoft now owns one of the main R front ends/enhancements, I 
believe.  But RStudio is Affero GPL (not sure about all their products). So 
there is some precedent for completely open-source interfaces enhancing the 
core project (though RStudio doesn't have exactly the same purpose as SMC, 
either as a company or software).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to