+1 to a catalog (using lazy imports as much as possible!)
+1 to removing not-very-common categories from global namespace
Not convinced about the alias AdditiveCommutativeGroups =
CommutativeAdditiveGroups. I believe it will just add confusion, and
wildcards are our friends (as in *AdditiveGroups*?). Besides, as was
mentioned, one can already get something close with
AdditiveGroups().AdditiveCommutative()
Open question: do we want the catalog to contain things like the short
hands CommutativeRings(), when we already have Rings().Commutative()?
When I implemented axioms, I left CommutativeRings around mostly with
backward compatibility in mind.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
