>From working on stuff that involves 100+ references, even having [1] causes 
problems. Then you also have essentially random numbers that can change on 
every new version of Sage. Also, I feel doing stuff like "Foo in [1]" can 
be overly verbose to redundant at times. So I am strongly for references in 
the [AC2016] format.

Best,
Travis

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to