Here is where the paper Richard mentions is located on the University
of Edinburgh website:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:35 PM, rjf <fate...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bundy's bibliography does not include this paper, which includes my critique
> and which has Bundy as a co-author.
> I think that you would find (unless PRESS has been substantially changed)
> PRESS has significantly fewer capabilities, returns results that are
> sometimes. Sometimes the results are mathematically wrong. For instance
> how effective would your "solve" program be if it could not divide
> There may be some task at which the PRESS meta-level analysis is
> useful, but it probably isn't improving "symbolic mathematical equation
> solving" for
> a CAS.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.