On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Jori Mäntysalo <jori.mantys...@uta.fi> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>> As far as I know, the only real use-case for milestone is a milestone like
>> `sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix` or `sage-pending`. I think that every
>> milestone of the form `sage-X.Y` is essentially treated equivalently.
> I normally use "sage-N" and mark myself as the author when I plan to do
> something in near future, and "sage-(N+1)" rarely when I guess that version
> N will be out before I got something done. I have used "sage-wishlist" few
> times when I have an idea. If I report a bug, I use "sage-N" and left
> author-field empty if I am not sure that I'll make patch myself.
> * * *
> But we don't have any plans like "Version 8 will be out about q1/2018 and
> will have mostly more support for numerical linear algebra.", and so
> milestones are not really used.
Yeah, I guess not. That's too bad...
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.