On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Paul Masson <paulmas...@comcast.net> wrote: > I'm very much in favor of making Three.js a standard package, with the > following caveats: > > 1) As of r80 the Three.js library has been reorganized to use ES6 Modules. > There is little point in asking people to download the entire library (even > with examples excluded as in the current optional package) unless we're > going to make Node.js a standard package as well. > > 2) The template only needs two files to function: the main build file, > minified or not, and OrbitControls.js for allowing user interaction. As a > standard package I'm in favor of Three.js only including the parts of the > library that will actually be used. If another file is needed in the future, > it can be added then. > > 3) As part of the review process of #12402, Andrey asked me explicitly about > the ease of embedding Three.js output in web pages. While I certainly want > to add a local copy of the required Three.js files for offline use, I'd like > to keep the output as portable as possible, and the simplest way to achieve > that is with a CDN link in the file. The template can be modified to check > for a local copy and fall back to the CDN or vice versa, but the HTTPS issue > would still need to be fixed on the server. > Alternately, a flag can be added to the viewer to specify that generated > output will be for online use and the template modified at runtime to use > the CDN rather than the local copy. That would of course require an extra > input from the end user, but may be preferable to the majority.
Please see also my recent ticket related to this: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22061 I don't think it's in any way in conflict with this, just something to keep in mind. > On Monday, December 26, 2016 at 7:16:55 PM UTC-8, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> How about making threejs a standard package? >> >> It was optional for a while, used in SageMathCell to power its own version >> of threejs viewer. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12402 has added threejs >> as possible output for a bunch of backends and ideally it will become >> standard for all interfaces. One of the problems now - the template loads >> scripts from the Internet, which means no offline use and causes issues with >> HTTPS anyway. >> >> Thank you, >> Andrey > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
