> > > i guess we already discussed about that on > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/sage-devel/$20Organisation$20of$20online$20$3A$20survey$20of$20developers|sort:relevance/sage-devel/vc2lXsjDwYU/2DswQOyNAQAJ
Did we reach a conclusion? The plan I outlined still holds. > > If you can not refrain to remove pages, please *rename* them instead of > > deleting and reecreate an alternative, so that we can follow their > > history. > At this point, I figure that if there are needed pages, then there wouldn't be duplicates. Most pages had another name that allowed MoinMoin to suggest a similarly named page (ex. /LinearAlgebraSEP <http://wiki.sagemath.org/LinearAlgebraSEP> doesn't exist after I renamed it to SEP/LinearAlgebra <http://wiki.sagemath.org/SEP/LinearAlgebra>, but works perfectly fine in suggesting.) I rely on that feature to help users try to find the designated page - that would have exactly the same content. It's better for anyone who would stumble across any system page to find what's right. From above, I don't think that there are any major links to these smaller pages that couldn't be solved from a simple search (assuming familiarity with MoinMoin). > > Also, a big grid table is definitely *not* a way to organize a wiki, it > is > > way too rigid, The terrible excuse here is that it's a work in progress. It still *is a wiki*, so it's the best way I could think of that was supported that shows what pages' purposes were (or are, if updated often). and the table markup makes it hard to modify for most > > users. A wiki is not a spreadsheet. It is better to organize > semantically, > > by thematics, with sections, not a single grid mixing everything with > > flags. > It'd be nice to have something like a map to show connections, but I don't think we can embed JS, or create some database. It's also hard to keep up with changes, so if someone changes the style and tone of content, any multilevel listing (or listing whatever the different types of pages) would need to change accordingly. We're not the Arch Wiki, so I shouldn't assume that this is important enough (shown in the discussion above) that it *would continue to be accurate*. My categorization is confusing, but I don't know what should be done that would please the greatest number of people. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
