Hi, On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 02:35:43PM +0200, Vincent Delecroix wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to have inplace version of transpose for matrices. For the > echelon form we have methods mat.echelonize vs mat.echelon_form. However I > do not see how to deal with transpose in the same way. I see three > reasonable possibilities > > 1) add an option inplace=True/False. There is at least one such method in > Sage: the relabel method for graphs. The behavior is as follows: > > if inplace=True: returns a new graph > if inplace=False: modifies the graph inplace and does not return anything
Do you mean the converse ? Ciao, Thierry > One can do the same with .transpose for matrices. However, this would be the > first time in matrix code. > > 2) Make a private inplace method mat._transpose_inplace() > > 3) Make a public inplace method mat.transpose_inplace() > > Any preference between 1), 2), 3) or a suggestion for something else is > welcome! > > Vincent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
