Hi,
On 2017-05-27, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote:
> Personally, I find it more intuitive if "sage -i PKGNAME" would
> unconditionally install the Sage package PKGNAME, even if PKGNAME was
> detected as system package.
I find it more intuitive if "sage -f PKGNAME" would install the Sage package
even when either the spkg or a system package is present, whereas I think
"sage -i PKGNAME" should only install the package if it isn't available
yet ("available" currently means "available as spkg", but should in future
mean "available either as spkg or system-wide").
Cheers,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
