Does this mean that eventually a solution to the texinfo crossreferencing problem in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21734 could be found?
(essentially, the problem was, if I remember correctly, that the way sphinx for sage is set up, sage is not a single project. Instead, we have many "external" references.) Martin Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2017 22:12:15 UTC+2 schrieb Jeroen Demeyer: > > See http://opendreamkit.org/2017/06/09/CythonSphinx/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
