On Saturday, August 12, 2017 at 4:50:28 PM UTC-7, rjf wrote:
> seems to me that asking for the "sign" of b^(1/3) in the complex domain
> is nonsense. There are 3 cube roots. Let q be one of them; it doesn't
> matter which.
> then - (1+sqrt(3)*i)*q/2 are the other two. Yes, two. because there
> are two sqrt(3).
I think the right pedantry here is to remark that there are *only* two (not
four) other roots, since, while there are two sqrt(3)'s and two i's, the
independent choices happen to lead to only two different elements of C.
It's a good argument for *not* writing (1+sqrt(3)*i)/2 for a primitive cube
root of unity.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.