Hi Travis, On 2017-10-30, Travis Scrimshaw <tsc...@ucdavis.edu> wrote: > My first question is that the method _strassen_default_echelon_cutoff seems > to return -1 and never be overwritten. This means that by default, the > echelonize will always use the classical in-place, making having a default > algorithm that automatically chosen a la XKCD. Does anyone use this? Should > we keep it, actually make it work, or get rid of the entire thing?
If I recall correctly (though I didn't look it up) I use the infrastructure for Strassen multiplication in matrix_gfpn_dense. I am not sure, though. it could be that the choice of multiplication algorithm is ultimately done in the backend (i.e., MeatAxe, in the case of matrix_gfpn_dense). Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
