On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 3:31:25 AM UTC-6, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Ralf Stephan <gtr...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Is deprecation necessary for class member functions starting with > > underscore, i.e. a weak "internal use" indicator? > > I don't know what the precedent is for Sage, but I would say no. > There are rare cases that an undescored member is actually documented > for public use, but that's fairly uncommon. If you *know* it's meant > as an internal method then I wouldn't deprecate it. >
The usual policy is no because it is not in the "public" namespace or documentation. Best, Travis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
