I think we should refrain from calling Maxima with bool(...) because our tests are good enough. Moreover with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24345 we could then simply return Unknown. Please review.
On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 8:12:49 AM UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > Actually Sage's logic is fine here, the bug with bool(val>0) is in > Maxima.The default with bool(relation) is to use RIF and at the default > setting it cannot decide, so ultimately Maxima is called: > > (%i2) is (%pi-(1116521080257783321*2^(23/2))/1029347477390786609545>0); > (%o2) true > > Regards, > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
