I think we should refrain from calling Maxima with bool(...) because our 
tests are good enough. Moreover with
we could then simply return Unknown. Please review.

On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 8:12:49 AM UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> Actually Sage's logic is fine here, the bug with bool(val>0) is in 
> Maxima.The default with bool(relation) is to use RIF and at the default 
> setting it cannot decide, so ultimately Maxima is called:
> (%i2) is (%pi-(1116521080257783321*2^(23/2))/1029347477390786609545>0);
> (%o2)                                true
> Regards,

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to