On Thursday, November 27, 2014 at 5:29:35 PM UTC+7, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> > Of course, proposing the statu quo may be unpopular ;-). Another
> solution I
> > can propose is to keep f.coefficients() as it is, make f.coeffs() an
> > of the former, and only keep f.list() for the list of all the
> If I understand what you said, you want "coefficients" to be left
> unchanged for compatibility reasons with other classes, and you want
> an easy way to get the *list* of coefficients too. While I do not see
> why this dense/sparse=True argument would be a problem (it is only
> optional, the default behaviour would not change), what about doing
> 1) Remove .coeffs
> 2) Update the doc of coefficients to hint that the *list* of
> coefficients can be obtained through list(P), or P.list ?
> I thought that we tried in Sage to avoid short names/abbreviations
> anyway, and it would also avoid the problem raised by Francis: a
> function whose name abbreviates another's should be an alias, nothing
How do remove .coeffs ? Help me
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.