> On 2/04/2018, at 16:27, John H Palmieri <jhpalmier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sunday, April 1, 2018 at 1:16:57 PM UTC-7, François Bissey wrote: > > > > On 2/04/2018, at 03:48, John H Palmieri <jhpalm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sunday, April 1, 2018 at 2:06:37 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: > > On Sunday, April 1, 2018 at 9:01:17 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > - when I do an incremental upgrade, I do not see these failures. > > - when I do 'make distclean; make ptestlong', I see them (with > > 8.2.beta8 or later; I haven't checked earlier versions). > > > > Is it the other way round? Surely it should work with "make distclean; > > make ptestlong"? > > > > > > It is not the other way around: failures when building from scratch, no > > failures when upgrading. > > > > I (painfully) checked on my old laptop and I get this stuff when > building from scratch too. So we have some kind of new mis-compilation > with clang. > > François > > You made a guess in email that it was Singular. Suggestions for how to test > this? >
Based on the libraries apparently involved. But looking at the chain of calls, i would be more inlined to suspect something in sage itself. Either in the glue to singular or in the coercion framework. But that’s speculative, I have no real ideas. Does anyone know if that breaks 8.1 as well? If not, we may be able to bisect something. François -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
