On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:21 PM Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> wrote: > > On 2018-07-18 13:34, Erik Bray wrote: > > This is again specious, and needlessly disparaging and antagonistic. > > I don't believe if takes 2 weeks to run CI tests > > Just replying on this point: the problem is that many things are not > caught by CI, especially things related to the build system and portability.
That's certainly true! But that's why we need a window in the first place in which we can discover and find those issues. If what Volker is saying in terms of adding additional 1-2 weeks of just "breathing room" then I agree with that and I apologize if I misunderstood. Though I do disagree with the assertion that the Cysignals update is "high-risk" (I would say that is much more the case with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25857 which is why I mostly agree with Volker's analysis of that one (though I don't like the unilateral "blocker -> major" changes either). What I do believe was disparaging and antagonistic was the wording, not the substance. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
