Do _l_action_ and _r_action_ actually work? We have the following occurrences:
dakrenn@nops:~$ sage -grep "_l_action_" sage/rings/multi_power_series_ring_element.py:# return self._l_action_(c) sage/rings/multi_power_series_ring_element.py: def _l_action_(self, c): sage/rings/multi_power_series_ring_element.py: sage: g = f._l_action_(1/2); g dakrenn@nops:~$ sage -grep "_r_action_" sage/rings/multi_power_series_ring_element.py:# def _r_action_(self, c): And inserting a print into the above's _l_action_ makes only one doctest fail, namely the one which explicitly calls this method. I ask, because I need this kind of behavior and [1] suggests to implement these methods. Best Daniel [1] http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/coercion/index.html#methods-to-implement -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
