Anyone have any thoughts on this? If not, then I will assume that the documentation was the intended behavior.
Best, Travis On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 7:15:00 AM UTC+10, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > It has to do more specifically with how GF(2^k) elements are interpreted > by an SBox. The documentation says they are treated differently than the > code, and I wanted to know which was correct. In particular, it was > interpreted in the code as a list in opposite order. So I would like to > know which is the correct behavior, which shows up in the > interpolation_polynomial doctests. > > Best, > Travis > > > On Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 1:17:38 AM UTC+10, Friedrich Wiemer > wrote: >> >> Is there anyone who used the SBox.interpolation_polynomial? >> Travis and I found a wird behaviour of the SBox.__call__ regarding >> finitie field elements as inputs and think that this is a bug.This is fixed >> in #25633 but it would be nice if someone who used this input (e.g. >> indirectly with the `interpolation_polynomial` method) could review this >> change and check if this brakes something? >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
