Dear all,
sorry for disappearing on this. I am a little confused: if both parent and
element refer to the same cache how is it possible that clearing one does not
clear the other?
S.
* E. Madison Bray <erik.m.b...@gmail.com> [2019-01-08 14:49:36]:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 1:51 AM Nils Bruin <nbr...@sfu.ca> wrote:
On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 12:48:30 PM UTC-8, Simon King wrote:I did the
implementation a couple of years ago, so, it is possible that
I misremember. However, if I recall correctly, having a reference
directly from the wrapped method to the cache, rather than going from the
wrapped method to the instance to which the method is bound and finally
to an item of the __dict__ of the instance, had a noticeable effect.
Yes, by the time you're operating on cython level, saving a few
attribute/dictionary lookups can be quite measurable.
Indeed--I was tired when I wrote my last message and did not mean
"either way" the way it reads. I specifically meant that two separate
caches seemed unnecessary. But each element having its own reference
to the cache can definitely be a speedup. In that case I don't see
what the problem is.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
