What the accepted best practice for fixing the failing python3 doc-tests?
For example, in `combinat/tutorial.py` I can fix one of the failing
doc-tests with:
sage: C = SetPartitions(["a", "b", "c"])
sage: C #py2
Set partitions of {'a', 'c', 'b'}
sage: C #py3
Set partitions of {'a', 'b', 'c'}
but this does not address the underlying problem. At first sight this looks
like an issue with `SetPartitions` and, indeed, `combinat/setpartition.py`
has several failing doc-tests but as far as I can see this is actually an
issue with `Set` even though `sets/set.py` passes all doc-tests. You can
see this because
Set(['a', 'b', 'c'])
gives different output with each sage session, at least when `sage` is
compiled with python3.
On Monday, 15 April 2019 21:56:54 UTC+10, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> sage-with-python3 (now using python 3.7.3) has now *less than 100 files*
> (94 precisely) with failing doctests, for a total of *324 failing
> doctests*. Among these, 34 files have a single failing doctest.
>
> A detailed summary can be found here :
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26212
>
> There remains many hard-to-fix issues. Please help if you can.
>
> * Matroid, dynamics and combinat people should care for their code. The
> cluster code needs particular work.
>
> * We should also strive to make all tests pass in rings/
>
> * An expert is required on src/sage/misc/classcall_metaclass.pyx
>
> Frédéric
>
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
