Le mercredi 2 octobre 2019 01:48:15 UTC+2, rjf a écrit : > > I think that if you read the paper you would not expect it to compete with > a CAS > except on its made-up artificial testset. >
Could you amplify ? > RJF > > > On Monday, September 30, 2019 at 10:57:44 AM UTC-4, Martin R wrote: >> >> Actually, I think it would be even more interesting to compare with >> FriCAS, because FriCAS has the most complete implementation of the Risch >> algorithm and does not at all rely on pattern matching. >> >> Martin >> >> Am Sonntag, 29. September 2019 15:00:01 UTC+2 schrieb mmarco: >>> >>> I would be very interested in comparing their results with RUBI. >>> >>> El viernes, 27 de septiembre de 2019, 21:53:00 (UTC+2), Eric Gourgoulhon >>> escribió: >>>> >>>> Thanks for sharing! >>>> This looks very promising. I hope we have it in Sage some day. >>>> >>>> Eric. >>>> >>>> Le vendredi 27 septembre 2019 17:06:31 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> https://openreview.net/pdf?id=S1eZYeHFDS >>>>> >>>>> I wish they had code available... >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/cb931fca-cca9-4610-a292-4759a44eccd1%40googlegroups.com.
