> The main person that has valid reason to want longer support for python2 > is William. > As he mentions, he has paying customers. >
I am 100% satisfied for my use case with cocalc by just keeping a copy of sage-8.9 available longterm. Fortunately, I don't need any sage-9.x versions to support python2. > At this point my only reasonable suggestion is to have a python2 > compatibility branch > for a while as sage-9.x while some of us plow on ahead without in > sage-10.x. > That’s unreasonable on the release manager unless someone step up to help. > > François > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/vYlbnAwKATM/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/BBC8CF32-2E9D-4DC0-BBE5-5130E15B3B14%40gmail.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CACLE5GC5ep%2BM%2BUSu%2BDK%2BY7SeGj3%3D4OD1f%3DSLXH8Et9vsAAFC%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.
