On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:35 AM arojas <[email protected]> wrote: > > El sábado, 11 de enero de 2020, 11:23:32 (UTC+1), Dima Pasechnik escribió: >> >> >> >> On Sat, 11 Jan 2020, 10:19 arojas, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I suspect this may be due to our openblas package only providing libblas.so >>> (not libcblas.so or liblapack.so, which in our case come from the netlib >>> blas). >> >> >> Are you saying that your libopenblas.so does not provide everything that is >> in openblas by default? >> >> This is largely defeating its purpose. >> Sage's openblas does provide the cblas and lapack capabilities. > > > In that case, openblas' spkg-configure should check whether cblas symbols > are provided by the system openblas, and if not it should compile sage's one. > It shouldn't unconditionally assume that that's always the case.
I maintain that it's a bug in Arch, that libopenblas cannot be used as a replacement of cblas and lapack, for it defeats its purpose. Most uses of BLAS routines are either via LAPACK, or from C/C++, via cblas. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/a1516e56-ab25-410e-be0f-75a7a6713466%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq31Y0-wgCUysZjgk5h4jsmnfuc%3D_M9H4RPG3iHeZD%3D6BA%40mail.gmail.com.
