Were there any tickets opened related to this? I didn't see anything linked to that on the wiki link Matthias posted.
In particular, I am wondering whether the stats module might be in a different category than the others. At the very least, even if "Sage-native" functionality were removed, it probably should be replaced with good documentation about how to use pandas or something similar from within Sage - something even a harried stats instructor who happens to be familiar with Sage could use. On Monday, May 4, 2020 at 8:26:55 AM UTC-4, kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Sunday, May 3, 2020 at 7:24:23 PM UTC-4, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: >> >> It might also be good to also include a message in the deprecation saying >> if you use this to maybe either a) implement an interface to the library or >> b) contact sage-devel regarding the desire to keep this feature. >> >> > > That is a pretty good idea - at least the "stats" it is conceivable > someone is using, since otherwise one has to explicitly use R/gsl/other > stats interfaces and that is obviously with a different syntax than the > usual Sage. But I wouldn't be surprised if even that was rarely used. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/ece57844-3b3c-49ca-8dc2-a9f9dce62bca%40googlegroups.com.
