> OK, I have to back peddle.  I'm checking through all my email, and
> it's true that we did put together a proposal for the 2009 JMM, but
> then (in consultation with somebody on the committee) decided not to
> submit it, partly because of another Sage MAA minicourse proposal for
> the same meeting.   So, the AMS certainly didn't reject our Sage
> proposal, since we didn't even submit it.   It turns out the Sage MAA
> proposal was rejected, and this rejection was considered "stunning" by
> some.  However, the proposer of that MAA minicourse said "our chances
> should be a lot better in a year..." though evidently that did not
> turn out to be the case, with another stunning rejection (?).
>

I'm not sure if we're talking about the same thing here... There was a
rejection of a general open-source MAA session, which they thought
might not have enough submissions, so we had a very nice, well-
attended MAA panel (R, Sage, Undergrad Research, and WebWorK)
instead.

I never heard anything about it being "stunning" that we were
rejected, so perhaps that is referring to a different proposal I'm not
aware of?  Jason's comments on the latest attempt are in a different
post in this thread, but it was a very different kind of proposal - a
summer week-long intensive online workshop.

> > Jason G. says, "it might be nice to get an idea of what they did/
> > didn't do" ... since we might want to submit a proposal for an MAA
> > minicourse eventually.  Not the same thing, but still... any ideas, on
> > or off list?
>
> Well one clear thing we did which prevented our proposal from being
> accepted was not submitting our proposal!
>

I don't say LOL much, but that's an LOL.

- kcrisman
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-edu" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to