> 3. That is a really weird error for Sage:
>
> sage: var('t,x')
> sage: assume(x>0)
> sage: integrate(e^(-t^3),(t,0,x))
> 1/6*(I*sqrt(3) - 1)*(gamma(1/3) - gamma(1/3, x^3))
> sage: integrate(e^(-t^3),(t,0,x)).diff(x)
> -1/2*(I*sqrt(3) - 1)*x^2*D[1](gamma)(1/3, x^3)
>
> Note that this derivative apparently has a derivative of the gamma
> function, with respect to the second input, evaluated at 1/3 and x^3.
> Then when we try to simplify the above, we get the error:Yeah, and this is connected to the changes in how we print "symbolic derivatives" from a year or two ago. I don't want to touch this code because of the potential to mess up how theoretical physics folks need this, but I think it should look more like Maxima or something that just leaves these unevaluated. I don't know that this will get fixed anytime soon, though. - kcrisman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-edu" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu?hl=en.
