> Sounds like there probably is plenty of work for a largish grant to have > someone work on Sage symbolics (and how it uses maxima/pynac/etc.) for a > while full-time. > > Of course, RJF and Tim Daly and Robert Dodier and others would say that > yes, there is multiple lifetimes of work that could be done on > symbolics, and many lifetimes of work that already has been done! >
Yes on both counts, but I find it more likely that the latter will prevail, particularly since it's not really Sage, but how we use the systems in question (and their strengths/weaknesses) that is really at issue. A Sage Days devoted to this - especially because many of the things are really just growing pains from our own implementations of quite a few years ago - would be nice, though. - kcrisman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-edu" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu?hl=en.
