On Friday, March 22, 2013 2:47:24 PM UTC-4, Dan Drake wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 at 09:57AM -0700, kcrisman wrote: > > Does anyone with experience with Sweave/knitr (in R) have any comments > > about whether SageTeX is easier or harder to use than that? > > I used Sweave to write an exam (which also used SageTeX...) and looking > at it again, I see that after you run "R CMD Sweave ..." (which is built > into R the same way that the SageTeX Python module is built into Sage), > you get a LaTeX file that requires Sweave.sty. That .sty file is, on my > computer, in /usr/share/R/share/texmf/tex/latex/ and I just made a > symlink to that from my own texmf directory. > > So it seems to be about the same effort to me. (But perhaps I'm not a > good person to make that judgment...) I'll make a note to compare some > of the R things when I fix up the SageTeX installation guide. >
By the way, the "state of the art" is now the knitr package. http://yihui.name/knitr/ Note the pgf use, and "allowing any languages", whatever that means. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-edu" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
