On Friday, February 7, 2014 4:33:37 PM UTC-5, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Hello everybody ! > > Sorry but my laptop is broken at the moment : I need an external screen to > turn it on and I don't have any around at the moment. So well, I can only > answer with my phone and of course not start Sage nor look at the code ! > > The problem is definitely my personal hate for loops. I hate this. And it > shows here. Honestly I prefer the current behavior because otherwise you > need to add loops everywhere if you want anything to be transitive. Plus > you would have to change the output of the transitive_reduction function to > make sure it adds loops everywhere otherwise the transitive reduction of > something would not be transitive. This is used in posets, and I do not > know if it is very bad for them. Anyway if you want to change those pieces > of code *please* add big red warnings about the loops in the function's doc > :-/ > > The problem in the code is my fault, but if you change this behavior > please ask the combinat poset guys. I write this kind of code, I don't use > it myself. >
Thanks, Nathann, I figured something like this. Robert, do you want to open a ticket about this? It would be good practice :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-edu" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
