David, thanks for asking Gavin about that. I should have clarified what I suspected to be the case, but I figured folks would have figured I figured it was relevant to us :) however it's true that they are probably looking for something a little more detailed than "it went great". However, even quantitative descriptions of how much time students spent on SMC or something might be interesting... or if you had a "control group" or something. Even if you end up writing a blog post, I would encourage others who (say) might have several sections taught and used an informal end-of-term survey to see about attitudes toward computation or whatever to submit something. It doesn't have to be crazy.
Along those lines, I would not call PRIMUS a math ed journal in the strict sense you are implying, so in general people shouldn't shy away from submitting things to it if they have some experience that others could benefit from they could write up in a fair amount of detail with some outcomes they can specifically point to. It very often is a place where the better papers from MAA contributed paper sessions in a specific topic show up. Such as in the special issue I edited on service-learning - not every (or any?) paper was highly quantitative in terms of social science/education research. I'm sure [William's wife, name redacted] and Susan of the UTMOST grant would kind of laugh at the lack of research methodology in many papers. But that is just the nature of math education at the collegiate level; other than with the largest sections at the largest institutions (think the massive study of calculus attitudes and outcomes at a number of institutions going on right now under quasi-MAA and NSF auspices) or big projects, it would be really hard to do "correct" social science methodology with what we do. And certainly with "early-adopter" stuff like IBL, certain technology, or ideas for how to start an actuarial program (a recent special issue), how would one even do that? I had an interesting chat with one of our psychologists about this very thing with something (not Sage-related) I did this past semester. But sharing such ideas is a very valuable thing to do, and not everyone can attend MathFest/JMM/Sectional Meetings - and certainly they can't attend all talks even if they do go :-) So I view PRIMUS as helping fill that gap. (Full disclosure; I am on the editorial board.) Also to David - I can't remember if I told you earlier, but the SIMIODE project (https://simiode.org/) is led by the long-time editor of PRIMUS, Brian Winkel. That presumably would be friendly to Sage-related activities... - kcrisman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-edu" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
