On 3/24/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello: > I've posted a short survey of Axiom on the wiki: > http://modular.math.washington.edu:9001/Axiom_as_an_OSCAS > If there are any comments, I'd be happy to hear them. Please be as > critical as you want! It is a draft of an article to appear > in SIGSAM Bull.
Thanks -- that's a very nice survey article. I have to admit, though, that I don't feel like the main question I personally have, and have always had, about Axiom is answered. And I'm not sure if your article should answer this, since your article is aimed at SIGSAM readers. But since you've just dived into Axiom, maybe you know. QUESTION: Can Axiom do anything at all relevant to number theory or arithmetic geometry better than MAGMA or SAGE? By better, I mean *faster*, irregardless of interface and easy of use issues. Does Axiom it implement any number theory or arithmetic geometry algorithms that are not implemented in MAGMA or SAGE? William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-forum URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
