On 7/24/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> On Jul 24, 2007, at 19:09 , William Stein wrote:
>
> >
> > On 7/24/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I was not paying attention when the notebook design was being
> >> discussed, so I was surprised to see that starting it up requires an
> >> "enabled" root login.  On Mac OS X, this is generally discouraged,
> >> and is not the default.
> >
> > The notebook can be run in both secure (https) and insecure mode.
> > When run in insecure mode, you
> > run as a user called "root", and things are pretty much like they were
> > before with the old version of the notebook.
>
> OK; I read the output from 'notebook?' and I have a little better
> understanding of the situation (and yes, I should have done that
> first; mea maxima culpa (mea sage culpa?)).

No, it's fine.   I'm just glad you got the ball rolling on this
discussion.

> > What is disconcerting?  I.e., what alternative would you like?
>
> The Mac OS X user has been (or should have been :-}) indoctrinated in
> the idea that 'root' is a Unix-ism that is useful in the hands of
> experts, but that should not be trifled with.  The system ships with
> the user "root" known, but with no "account" supporting a login by
> "root".
>
> After a brief look at the source, it's still not clear.  Are these
> accounts distinct from the "/etc/passwd" accounts of Unix fame?  In
> particular, is 'root' the Unix 'root'?

To be clear, there is absolutely no relationship between user accounts
on OS X and the SAGE notebook.  The SAGE notebook logins and crypto
hashed passwords are stored in the nb.sobj in the sage_notebook folder.

Would calling the account "admin" instead of "root" be helpful?
Basically an account with such privileges should probably exist,
and it needs to be called something.

> > I would be very happy if some people including you would read the
> > output of notebook?, understand how the current model works, and
> > propose
> > some alternatives.  Basically the user model that we worked out at SD4
> > was only one of the many usage cases, i.e., the one for the public
> > notebook server.
>
> I will spend some time looking it over.

Thanks.  I'm not at all opposed to changing what's there -- I'm sure
nobody's got too used to it already, since it's only been out there
for a few days.

William

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-forum
URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to