Hi, I guess the best way to have an idea of what the project is is to have a look at how polynomials are implemented in Sage, what underlying libraries are used, how they are interfaced and so on. You'll see it is quite a mess with classes mostly relying on one low level C library but also calling functions from other C libraries for specific methods. This is nor clean nor really optimized, a lot of time is lost converting btw the binary format the different libraries are expecting.
Best, JPF On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 4:29:32 PM UTC+1, Anshuman Pati wrote: > > Yes, I am doing that. I also wish to make contributions to the current > codebase of SageMath and was wondering if there are any issues I can start > working on. > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 9:21:49 AM UTC+5:30, Stefan van Zwam wrote: >> >> Until that time, you can familiarize yourself with SageMath development, >> and start writing your proposal. >> >> Note that the "ideas page" only has suggestions for things you might work >> on, it is up to you to write a proposal. Also, we can't select everyone who >> applies. >> >> On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 11:17:44 AM UTC-6, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >>> >>> The mentor of this project is away from the office till the end of the >>> week. He promised to get in touch then. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-gsoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-gsoc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
