This reminded me that long, long ago, I thought about Z[i] in sage for the same reason (teaching G13FNT as John will remember) : http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/7545
I believe that the default I in sage should have the ring Z[i] as parents, the elements of Z[i] should print as a+bi not bi+a; they should have gcd, factorisation, ... just like in pari. One might argue against implementing Z[i] as a particular case, but there might be others that could used it for teaching like John and me. Of course the patch there is useless, but it points to what might be usefull to have. Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-nt" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-nt. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
