The wall time isn't comparable, different system load.
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 3:00:33 PM UTC+2, leif wrote: > > Volker Braun wrote: > > With Sage-6.8 is pretty much the same, maybe ~< 10% less memory usage; > > In any case no drastic change. > > Just about 50+% increase in build time...? ;-) > > > -leif > > For reference: The figures for 6.9.rc0: > > https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-fvz6bvxGrVo/Vgaae7pRfgI/AAAAAAAAXkE/c4eAUFjADgE/s1600/make-j4.png > > > > > < > https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/--2ehZ4UbeAA/VgffV2dBKcI/AAAAAAAAXlE/WKaIWN0FxBE/s1600/make-doc-2.png> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 8:49:43 PM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer > wrote: > > > > On 2015-09-26 14:48, Volker Braun wrote: > > > Though afaik our docs say that you need 2gb per process, so you > were > > > quite a bit below that. It could just be slightly different order > of > > > execution that blows things up now even though memory consumption > > didn't > > > increase. > > > > The question is: did it really not increase? You should compare 6.8 > > with > > 6.9.rc0 for example. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
