Francois Bissey wrote: > >> On 29/11/2015, at 08:16, leif <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Volker Braun wrote: >>> 8400a23 Updated Sage version to 6.10.beta6 >> >> Besides the usual doctest failure*, I'm getting new numerical noise in >> beta6: >> >> sage -t --long --warn-long 60.9 src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx >> ********************************************************************** >> File "src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx", line 3761, in >> sage.matrix.matrix_double_dense.Matrix_double_dense.exp >> Failed example: >> A.exp() # tol 1e-14 >> Expected: >> [-19.614602953804912 + 12.517743846762578*I 3.7949636449582176 + >> 28.88379930658099*I] >> [ -32.383580980922254 + 21.88423595789845*I 2.269633004093535 + >> 44.901324827684824*I] >> Got: >> [-19.614602953804923 + 12.517743846762574*I 3.7949636449582007 + >> 28.883799306580993*I] >> [-32.383580980922275 + 21.884235957898447*I 2.2696330040935115 + >> 44.901324827684846*I] >> Tolerance exceeded in 1 of 8: >> 2.269633004093535 vs 2.2696330040935115, tolerance 1e-14 > 1e-14 >> ********************************************************************** >> 1 item had failures: >> 1 of 11 in sage.matrix.matrix_double_dense.Matrix_double_dense.exp >> [636 tests, 1 failure, 1.65 s] >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> sage -t --long --warn-long 60.9 src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx >> # 1 doctest failed >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> (Linux on a Haswell, GCC 5.1.0) >> > > Curious that’s the only place. Do we have patchbots running gcc 5.1.0? > Which distro also?
Otherwise still Lucid (Ubuntu 10.04.4, meanwhile EOL); GCC is configured to produce native code by default, so other machines with the same processor architecture and the same or a similar GCC version may still produce different results. >> __________ >> * >> sage -t --long --warn-long 60.9 src/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx >> ********************************************************************** >> File "src/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx", line 11021, in >> sage.symbolic.expression.Expression._plot_fast_callable >> Failed example: >> plot(s) >> Expected: >> Graphics object consisting of 1 graphics primitive >> Got: >> Graphics object consisting of 0 graphics primitives >> ********************************************************************** >> 1 item had failures: >> 1 of 10 in sage.symbolic.expression.Expression._plot_fast_callable >> [2526 tests, 1 failure, 34.28 s] >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> sage -t --long --warn-long 60.9 src/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx # 1 >> doctest failed >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Starting from which version did you start to have that one? I don't recall; I've reported it a couple of times (but apparently nobody really cared -- including me) perhaps a year, maybe longer, ago (same distro, but other machines). -leif -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
