On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 9:24:28 AM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2016-11-02 10:16, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I would rather treat cysignals as a part of Python suite, and make sure > > they are built together with Python > > a sort of "codependency" - let's say Python is codependent on cysignals > > if they are to be built right after Python. > > Surely there are more examples like this that can simplify our > > dependencies graph. > > -1 because I don't see the point, what is so special about cysignals? It > will only complicate the build system. >
My point is that cysignals is essentially a part of the Sage's build system. Imagine you would need to declare a dependence on python in every package that uses python... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
