This is probably due to the changes in 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23193

Le mercredi 23 août 2017 11:55:50 UTC+2, [email protected] a écrit :
>
> function_field doctests are way too long !
>
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long src/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py
> **********************************************************************
> File "src/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py", line 67, in sage.
> rings.function_field.function_field
> Warning, slow doctest:
>     TestSuite(K).run()
> Test ran for 7.59 s
> **********************************************************************
> File "src/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py", line 68, in sage.
> rings.function_field.function_field
> Warning, slow doctest:
>     TestSuite(L).run()  # long time (8s on sage.math, 2012)
> Test ran for 160.36 s
> **********************************************************************
> File "src/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py", line 69, in sage.
> rings.function_field.function_field
> Warning, slow doctest:
>     TestSuite(M).run()  # long time (52s on sage.math, 2012)
> Test ran for 328.39 s
> **********************************************************************
> File "src/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py", line 70, in sage.
> rings.function_field.function_field
> Warning, slow doctest:
>     TestSuite(N).run(skip = '_test_derivation')  # long time
> Test ran for 73.26 s
> **********************************************************************
> File "src/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py", line 71, in sage.
> rings.function_field.function_field
> Warning, slow doctest:
>     TestSuite(O).run(skip = '_test_derivation')  # long time
> Test ran for 44.69 s
> **********************************************************************
> File "src/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py", line 74, in sage.
> rings.function_field.function_field
> Warning, slow doctest:
>     TestSuite(S).run()
> Test ran for 1.88 s
> **********************************************************************
> File "src/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py", line 460, in sage.
> rings.function_field.function_field.FunctionField._test_derivation
> Warning, slow doctest:
>     TestSuite(K).run() # indirect doctest
> Test ran for 1.63 s
>     [458 tests, 621.69 s]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> All tests passed!
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Total time for all tests: 621.8 seconds
>     cpu time: 620.1 seconds
>     cumulative wall time: 621.7 seconds
>
>
>
>
> Le mercredi 23 août 2017 10:44:45 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>>
>> On Debian testing running on Core i7 + 16 GB RAM (MAKE="make -j8"), 
>> passes ptestlong with one failure : 
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> sage -t --long src/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py  # Timed 
>> out
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> which passes with no failure (but needs 669.8 seconds (!))  when ran 
>> standalone.
>>
>> For comparison, the same test , called by "make ptestlong" on a slightly 
>> smaller macine (Debian on Core i3 + 8 GB RAM, MAKE="make -j4") took 817.25 
>> seconds (and did not reach the timeout limit...).
>>
>> Hypothesis : ptestlong's computation of the timeout limit is more 
>> conservative on the "smaller" machine.
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> --
>> Emmanuel Charpentier
>>
>>
>> Le mardi 22 août 2017 00:23:40 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
>>>
>>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>>>
>>> 037272ccba (tag: 8.1.beta3) Updated SageMath version to 8.1.beta3
>>> e5005bdf80 Trac #23622: LatticePoset doc, use the master bib file
>>> e87f9b5ac6 Trac #19339: Use digraph labels if present for ClusterAlgebra 
>>> and ClusterQuiver
>>> c8a96622b7 Trac #23654: Bug in ClusterAlgebra _coerce_map_from_
>>> 8808ca4011 Trac #23651: py3 more cmp for polynomial ring elements
>>> 03bad70bdc Trac #23649: py3 richcmp for Gamma congruence groups
>>> 3b249bf9dc Trac #23641: py3: another load of absolute imports in cython 
>>> files
>>> 8c4222beb7 Trac #23636: arccoth(float) returns complex
>>> 6c8bd5d748 Trac #23633: infinite polynomial: iterate over 
>>> coefficient/monomial
>>> 7f7f583875 Trac #23608: Riemann surfaces: homomorphisms, interfacing, 
>>> sums
>>> aff66a3b37 Trac #23583: py3: some more richcmp in schemes, rings, and 
>>> combinat
>>> efaeac41d1 Trac #20932: Issues with p1list in modular symbols
>>> af8f63c5b1 Trac #23624: 0 should not be a primitive root
>>> e55b6ea474 Trac #23378: GradedCommutativeAlgebra constructor passes 
>>> names as NCPolynomial_plural
>>> 5af5f731a4 Trac #23472: The error message for splitting_field when name 
>>> is None does not match that of NumberField
>>> 689096eed8 Trac #23620: gcd has wrong parent
>>> 8e2e4876b2 Trac #23609: Don't use wrong Cremona labels in 
>>> elliptic_curves database
>>> 3cbfcdae00 Trac #23160: Add a library of common helper functions for use 
>>> in spkg-install
>>> ae0118fcc7 Trac #7304: Contract edge in graph
>>> f70241fb6c Trac #23617: Zq's default type  in the documentation didn't 
>>> agree with the code
>>> d2f8470c67 Trac #23616: fmpz_mat_to_mpz_array ignores exceptions
>>> 41836402a7 Trac #23605: Heisenberg group
>>> 39f21c47d9 Trac #23379: LatticePoset: add adjunct()
>>> effcedba41 (tag: 8.1.beta2) Updated SageMath version to 8.1.beta2
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-release.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to