Hi John, On 2017-11-17, John H Palmieri <[email protected]> wrote: > For the first paragraph, we have to deal with the definition of "usable". > The philosophy for some time has been that Sage without documentation is > not fully usable.
OK, you got a point here. > For the second paragraph, there has been some progress made, yes. Also, > there is the question of to what extent the default build process should be > tailored toward developers, who are more likely to run into problems with > the documentation (because the problems have occurred in the past when > changing branches, for example), vs. toward users who are not developers. Is that so? I wasn't aware and thought that the build errors can also happen when building the docs for the first time. Now I understand the rationale behind the change of build order. Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
