the easiest might be to build pythonX if --with-python=X is specified. On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 6:42 AM François Bissey <frp.bis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes. sagenb is no a real optional package even with python2. We overlooked > the test suite when we made some test depending on it just “# py2”. > That was in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28805. > We probably really should have introduced `# sagenb` in insight. > But honestly I don’t care that much about python2 anymore. > In 30 days it will be best efforts at best for python2. > > > On 2/12/2019, at 6:50 PM, John H Palmieri <jhpalmier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > In particular, SageNB is not built with Python 2, but the doctester thinks > > it should be: > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-release" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/0E399888-BECC-4272-80DE-A3FCB6777940%40gmail.com.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq1KtdpLYBEOT2E8Y1MEiST10J1kve_wBxMfJVAH9soXmg%40mail.gmail.com.
