Le vendredi 31 janvier 2020 22:14:59 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 8:58 PM Emmanuel Charpentier > <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Le vendredi 31 janvier 2020 21:50:55 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > >> > >> Please send SAGE_ROOT/config.log > > this looks good, and in fact libffi gets built; indeed, your install.log > says: > > [libffi-3.2.1] Copying package files from temporary location > /usr/local/sage-9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/libffi-3.2.1/inst to > /usr/local/sage-9/local > [libffi-3.2.1] Successfully installed libffi-3.2.1 > [libffi-3.2.1] Deleting temporary build directory > [libffi-3.2.1] /usr/local/sage-9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/libffi-3.2.1 > [libffi-3.2.1] Finished installing libffi-3.2.1.spkg > > You might want to check for presense of libffi.so in local/lib/ > but I'm positive it's there,
You're right. So why didn't I get the compilation log ? > so it's ECL build that's failing for > unrelated reasons, probably cause your headers are a bit broken > somewhere: > I guess ECL tries to use system headers, even though it should not. > > My conjecture is that it was always the case, and it went unnoticed > until libffi 3.3 was released, with something broken. > Previously, even if libffi-dev (Debian) was installed, its headers > were similar enough to the one supplied by Sage to work, > so if they were picked up then it still worked. > > To test this you might try to "apt remove libffi-dev" and then "./sage > -i ecl"; if I'm right here then it will work. > I can do that but as a very temporary measure: removing libffi-dev break other parts of my system : charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sudo apt-get remove -s libffi-dev Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait Les paquets suivants ont été installés automatiquement et ne sont plus nécessaires : gir1.2-poppler-0.18 libblkid-dev libbsd-dev libcairo-script-interpreter2 libglib2.0-dev-bin libmount-dev libpixman-1-dev libselinux1-dev libsepol1-dev libxcb-render0-dev libxcb-shm0-dev Veuillez utiliser « sudo apt autoremove » pour les supprimer. Les paquets suivants seront ENLEVÉS : ghc libcairo2-dev libffi-dev libglib2.0-dev libpoppler-glib-dev 0 mis à jour, 0 nouvellement installés, 5 à enlever et 0 non mis à jour. Remv ghc [8.8.1+dfsg1+is+8.6.5+dfsg1-2+b1] Remv libpoppler-glib-dev [0.71.0-6] Remv libcairo2-dev [1.16.0-4] Remv libglib2.0-dev [2.62.4-1+b1] Remv libffi-dev [3.3-3] I suippose I have to do the whole cycle (distclean ; configure ; make) again... Stay tuned. > > > > > > > > > > Attached. > > > >> > >> > >> this is the most interesting one, to understand why libffi didn't get > built > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 7:58 PM Emmanuel Charpentier > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > Damn ! > >> > > >> > After make distclean and ./configure --without-system-libffi, make > fails with the same error as before. > >> > > >> > AND LIBFFI ISN'T COMPILED (no libffi* in logs/pkgs). > >> > > >> > Relevant logs attached. > >> > > >> > Le vendredi 31 janvier 2020 20:37:03 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a > écrit : > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Le vendredi 31 janvier 2020 20:30:39 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > >> >>> > >> >>> just as a sanity check, please verify that Sage's libffi got built. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> It did. No joy. > >> >> > >> >> Currently re-makeing after distclean. Don't hold your breath and > have a nice walk... > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 7:22 PM Emmanuel Charpentier > >> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Indeed : make has failed with the same failure as before. To > confirm this, I'll distclean and retry, but don't believe it will be > successful. Kep you posted. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > HTH, > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Le vendredi 31 janvier 2020 20:17:57 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier > a écrit : > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> Le vendredi 31 janvier 2020 16:06:12 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a > écrit : > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> have you updated system's libffi lately? > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> Possibly: I follow Debian testing, but do not look closely each > and every upgrade. Currently, I have : > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ dpkg -l "libffi*" | > cat > >> >>> >> Souhait=inconnU/Installé/suppRimé/Purgé/H=à garder > >> >>> >> | > État=Non/Installé/fichier-Config/dépaqUeté/échec-conFig/H=semi-installé/W=attend-traitement-déclenchements > > > >> >>> >> |/ Err?=(aucune)/besoin Réinstallation (État,Err: > majuscule=mauvais) > >> >>> >> ||/ Nom Version Architecture Description > >> >>> >> > +++-================-============-============-====================================================== > > > >> >>> >> ii libffi-dev:amd64 3.3-3 amd64 Foreign Function > Interface library (development files) > >> >>> >> un libffi4-dev <aucune> <aucune> (aucune > description n'est disponible) > >> >>> >> ii libffi6:amd64 3.2.1-9 amd64 Foreign Function > Interface library runtime > >> >>> >> ii libffi6:i386 3.2.1-9 i386 Foreign Function > Interface library runtime > >> >>> >> ii libffi7:amd64 3.3-3 amd64 Foreign Function > Interface library runtime > >> >>> >> ii libffi7:i386 3.3-3 i386 Foreign Function > Interface library runtime > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> Could you try > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> ./configure --without-system-libffi > >> >>> >>> make > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> ? > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> Underway. I'm not optimistic: ecl has been recompiled after > reconfiguration, and the log file still ends with : > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> gcc -DECLDIR="\"/usr/local/sage-9/local/lib/ecl-16.1.2\"" -I. > -I/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/ecl-16.1.2.p5/src/build > -I/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/ecl-16.1.2.p5/src/src/c > -I../ecl/gc -DECL_API -DECL_NO_LEGACY -D_GNU_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g -O2 -fPIC -Dlinux -c -o ffi.o ffi.o.c > >> >>> >> > /usr/local/sage-9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/ecl-16.1.2.p5/src/src/c/ffi.d:148:34: > > error: 'FFI_SYSV' undeclared here (not in a function) > >> >>> >> 148 | {@':cdecl', FFI_SYSV}, > >> >>> >> | ^ > >> >>> >> make[6]: *** [Makefile:86: ffi.o] Error 1 > >> >>> >> make[6]: Leaving directory > '/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/ecl-16.1.2.p5/src/build/c' > >> >>> >> make[5]: *** [Makefile:119: libeclmin.a] Error 2 > >> >>> >> make[5]: Leaving directory > '/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/ecl-16.1.2.p5/src/build' > >> >>> >> make[4]: *** [Makefile:70: all] Error 2 > >> >>> >> make[4]: Leaving directory > '/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/ecl-16.1.2.p5/src' > >> >>> >> > ******************************************************************************** > > > >> >>> >> Error building ecl-16.1.2.p5 > >> >>> >> > ******************************************************************************** > > > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> I'll keep you posted. > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 2:45 PM Emmanuel Charpentier > >> >>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> > On the same machine, I can't rebuild Sage from scratch (in a > different directiory). ./configure + make distclean + make ptestalllong > fails at building ECL, which complaints: > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> > gcc -DECLDIR="\"/usr/local/sage-9/local/lib/ecl-16.1.2\"" -I. > -I/usr/local/sage- > >> >>> >>> > 9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/ecl-16.1.2.p5/src/build > -I/usr/local/sage-9/local/var > >> >>> >>> > /tmp/sage/build/ecl-16.1.2.p5/src/src/c -I../ecl/gc -DECL_API > -DECL_NO_LEGACY > >> >>> >>> > -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g -O2 -fPIC -Dlinux > -c -o ffi.o ffi.o.c > >> >>> >>> > > /usr/local/sage-9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/ecl-16.1.2.p5/src/src/c/ffi.d:148:34: > > > >> >>> >>> > error: 'FFI_SYSV' undeclared here (not in a function) > >> >>> >>> > 148 | {@':cdecl', FFI_SYSV}, > >> >>> >>> > | ^ > >> >>> >>> > make[6]: *** [Makefile:86: ffi.o] Error 1 > >> >>> >>> > make[6]: Leaving directory > '/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/ecl-16.1. > >> >>> >>> > 2.p5/src/build/c' > >> >>> >>> > make[5]: *** [Makefile:119: libeclmin.a] Error 2 > >> >>> >>> > make[5]: Leaving directory > '/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/ecl-16.1. > >> >>> >>> > 2.p5/src/build' > >> >>> >>> > make[4]: *** [Makefile:70: all] Error 2 > >> >>> >>> > make[4]: Leaving directory > '/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/ecl-16.1.2.p5/src' > >> >>> >>> > > ******************************************************************************** > > > >> >>> >>> > Error building ecl-16.1.2.p5 > >> >>> >>> > > ******************************************************************************** > > > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> > Relevant logs attached. > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> > Le mardi 28 janvier 2020 16:15:21 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier > a écrit : > >> >>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> On Debian testing running on core I5 + 8 GB RAM, upgrading > from Python 3-based 9.1.beta1 to 9.1.beta2: > >> >>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> passes ptestlong without failure; > >> >>> >>> >> does NOT pass ptestalllong, which gets interrupted by > multiple failures while doctesting findstat.py : see attached > ptestalllong.log. > >> >>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> I had similar failures with 9.1.beta1 on another machine, > which I (probably wrongly) ended up attributing to transient networking > problems (a repeat attempt succeeded). I'll test 9.1.beta2 on this second > machine. > >> >>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> HTH; > >> >>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> Le mardi 28 janvier 2020 00:04:20 UTC+1, Volker Braun a > écrit : > >> >>> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the > "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is > at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > >> >>> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >>> 2cbd93e0b7 (tag: 9.1.beta2, trac/develop) Updated SageMath > version to 9.1.beta2 > >> >>> >>> >>> fb9218e13b Trac #29072: unused import cleaning ticket > (partial) > >> >>> >>> >>> 7cec05e0c7 Trac #28755: "The following package(s) may have > failed to build": Improve output > >> >>> >>> >>> bb5110ca19 Trac #27315: Minor optimizations to libsingular > polynomials > >> >>> >>> >>> 18389bdd76 Trac #29070: Queer tableaux for B(-infinity) and > B(lambda) > >> >>> >>> >>> bdfebfb180 Trac #29069: Fix broken link in crystals catalog > >> >>> >>> >>> 96695b33cf Trac #29068: little cleanup of imports and tweak > again .lgtm.yml > >> >>> >>> >>> 4da45e2169 Trac #29067: Make ./configure --help a bit > shorter by combining --with-system-SPKG and --with-system-SPK=force > >> >>> >>> >>> 1c5d011b5f Trac #29038: Python package sage_conf: Provides > optional configuration information for sagelib > >> >>> >>> >>> 9cf951e6ea Trac #29007: faster permutation conversions > between GAP and Sage > >> >>> >>> >>> aff7f32ac2 Trac #28247: Parametrize the cube/hypercube > functions in the library of polytopes > >> >>> >>> >>> 0d63d6e276 Trac #21413: A class for ring extensions > >> >>> >>> >>> 349a5ab632 Trac #29044: Add default warnings filters in a > Python debug build > >> >>> >>> >>> 7de6a929a5 Trac #29046: Minor improvements in > sage.rings.number_field.galois_group > >> >>> >>> >>> 35411d34b1 Trac #29011: speed up number field element > conversions > >> >>> >>> >>> 10ad03d047 Trac #28787: _add_ method for tensors with > indices > >> >>> >>> >>> 1a1e1a0935 Trac #4618: Puiseux series > >> >>> >>> >>> 3c92cbc37c Trac #29063: spkg-configure.m4 for planarity > >> >>> >>> >>> 229d4365d8 Trac #29057: make stack method of Polyhedron use > fraction_field > >> >>> >>> >>> ed23ee3c7d Trac #29049: partially reverse the logic of py2 > / py3 doctest fixing > >> >>> >>> >>> 788a2d642f Trac #29048: 1 doctest failing in > src/sage/databases/oeis.py with tag internet > >> >>> >>> >>> 3dcf55bec6 Trac #29047: 1 internet doctest failing in > repl/load.py > >> >>> >>> >>> fcc768db49 Trac #28989: Bug in proper cycles of indefinite > binary quadratic forms > >> >>> >>> >>> f1dc86f78b Trac #29026: update m4ri(e) to Jan 2020 versions > >> >>> >>> >>> 3d8399c96a Trac #29035: some details in free pre-Lie > algebras > >> >>> >>> >>> 3f9ef468a2 Trac #29002: spkg-configure.m4 for sqlite > >> >>> >>> >>> 59f6a83618 Trac #28999: qepcad interface is broken with > python3 > >> >>> >>> >>> c10179b2eb Trac #28996: Have `implementation='NTL'` work > for series over ZZ > >> >>> >>> >>> 44345faf0b Trac #28616: CombinatorialFace: replace Vrepr() > and Hrepr() by more consistent names > >> >>> >>> >>> 3deaa0a61a Trac #28385: tides does not pass self-tests on > 32bit system > >> >>> >>> >>> dde78cbd22 (tag: 9.1.beta1) Updated SageMath version to > 9.1.beta1 > >> >>> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > -- > >> >>> >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google Groups "sage-release" group. > >> >>> >>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from > it, send an email to [email protected]. > >> >>> >>> > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/14893264-c655-4932-8b03-be917e5f0892%40googlegroups.com. > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > -- > >> >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google Groups "sage-release" group. > >> >>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > send an email to [email protected]. > >> >>> > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/be427777-3869-4e99-82cd-7a8300e91c4f%40googlegroups.com. > > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "sage-release" group. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > send an email to [email protected]. > >> > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/f168a0e4-3ad6-43d0-ada6-58b0744f3768%40googlegroups.com. > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "sage-release" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/f5b1c484-fd07-4abe-afc3-8afbd1468f75%40googlegroups.com. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/71899b52-1852-46be-9a1b-4ba00bf7c75b%40googlegroups.com.
