On Sunday, March 29, 2020 at 8:59:43 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > I don't see any major issues for 9.1 any more, so we should soon have the > first rc. If you have anything that you thing should go in then now is the > time to finish it up ;-) > > 6a4580546f (tag: 9.1.beta9, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to > 9.1.beta9 >
Let me remark that this is the first beta that tries to use the system python3 in a venv (#27824) instead of building our own copy of python3. Tests of building from scratch or (after "make python3-clean") would be valuable. I ran tests (make build ptest) at https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/actions/runs/65613035 . Full logs for all builds are available at this link. *Debian* (jessie/buster/bullseye/sid), *Ubuntu* (trusty/xenial/bionic/eoan/focal)m and *LinuxMint* (19.3) are mostly clean. Some of the doctest failures are likely known to distribution packagers already. If fixes for these doctests are available already, now it's time to upstream them. Some doctest failures, for example ubuntu-bionic-standard ( https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/runs/542655815): sage -t src/sage/interfaces/r.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/interfaces/tachyon.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/tests/cmdline.py # 3 doctests failed ubuntu-eoan-standard https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/runs/542655826 sage -t src/sage/interfaces/giac.py # 2 doctests failed sage -t src/sage/interfaces/r.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/interfaces/tachyon.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/tests/cmdline.py # 3 doctests failed debian-buster-standard (https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/runs/542655851) sage -t src/sage/combinat/tutorial.py # 2 doctests failed sage -t src/sage/interfaces/ecm.py # 3 doctests failed sage -t src/sage/interfaces/r.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/interfaces/tachyon.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/libs/libecm.pyx # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/rings/finite_rings/element_pari_ffelt.pyx # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/rings/padics/padic_lattice_element.py # 3 doctests failed sage -t src/sage/schemes/hyperelliptic_curves/hyperelliptic_finite_field.py # 2 doctests failed sage -t src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/tests/books/computational-mathematics-with-sagemath/combinat_doctest.py # 2 doctests failed sage -t src/sage/tests/cmdline.py # 3 doctests failed debian-bullseye-standard (https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/runs/542655863) sage -t src/sage/interfaces/r.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/interfaces/tachyon.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/lfunctions/dokchitser.py # 2 doctests failed sage -t src/sage/lfunctions/pari.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/interfaces/maxima.py # Timed out sage -t src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py # 8 doctests failed sage -t src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py # 2 doctests failed sage -t src/sage/rings/number_field/unit_group.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/rings/padics/padic_lattice_element.py # 3 doctests failed sage -t src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py # 2 doctests failed sage -t src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx # Timed out sage -t src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py # 3 doctests failed sage -t src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/height.py # 6 doctests failed sage -t src/sage/schemes/plane_conics/con_number_field.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/tests/cmdline.py # 3 doctests failed *Fedora* (26-32), *Centos* (7-8): Fedora 26: clean Fedora 27, 28, 29: Critical test failures in sage.combinat, likely because of symmetrica https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29405 Fedora 30 and 31: Doctest build error related to eclib Fedora 32: Build errors with various packages. Fedora 32 already ships gcc 10! Centos 7 and 8: clean *Arch Linux*: clean *Slackware: *Build error with freetype; https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29373 needs review *macOS:* homebrew-macos-minimal: sage -t src/sage/interfaces/gap.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t src/sage/rings/padics/padic_lattice_element.py # 3 doctests failed sage -t src/sage/sets/recursively_enumerated_set.pyx # 2 doctests failed homebrew-macos-standard: pynac build error - https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29404 needs review homebrew-conda-forge-minimal: gfan build error - https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28984 homebrew-conda-forge-standard: numpy build error -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/63f61392-1ddc-4047-ab52-4a7c8095a58b%40googlegroups.com.
