On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, rebuilding 9.1.rc2 afresh
(make distclean, make config , ./configure, make ptestlong) leads to ten
permanent errors:
File Result P/T
src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py 3 doctests failed P
src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py 7 doctests failed P
src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx 1 doctest failed P
src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py 2 doctests failed P
src/sage/lfunctions/dokchitser.py 2 doctests failed P
src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx 1 doctest failed P
src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py 2 doctests failed P
src/sage/lfunctions/pari.py 1 doctest failed P
src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx 1 doctest failed P
src/sage/rings/number_field/unit_group.py 1 doctest failed P
The results of re-running these tests is in the attached file chkerrs.txt.
HTH,
Le mercredi 6 mai 2020 00:24:12 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> There are no more open blocker tickets no now would be a good time for you
> to test if you haven't already!
>
>
> bfbaddcc58 (tag: 9.1.rc3, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.1.rc3
> ec4fd4a567 Trac #29625: support for weighted term orders in normal_basis
> 6e2957b534 Trac #29348: Remove dependency on 'twisted' for some unpickling
> in cartan_type
> d51fbf9df3 Trac #28753: Ramification Type for Rational Maps
> fa25d32e2e Trac #24601: 3D plot missing axis labels and tick numbers with
> viewer='threejs' and displayed in chrome.
> f0f8016277 Trac #29624: PermutationGroup_generic.__richcmp__ does not
> check for op_NE
> c8c581e29b Trac #29609: Compute the Conway mass directly from the genus
> symbol.
> dc102aa724 Trac #29604: Laurent polynomials rings in characteristic 2 have
> strange generators
> 6bf0780980 Trac #29592: change _cmp_ to _richcmp_ in finite rings
> 013ce41106 Trac #29570: Wrong parent when using diff_form of degree zero
> 951a41f7b3 Trac #29553: add a method to test whether a polynomial is
> symmetric
> 1b358237ec Trac #25797: Implement graftal lace cellular automata
> 17e126688a Trac #29627: "sage -python", "sage -pip", etc.: Do not fall
> back to system Python
> a4a63c8349 Trac #29626: Remove ./configure --enable-SPKG options for pip
> packages (for which this is not implemented)
> e4fd7dfe8a Trac #29618: build/pkgs/conda.txt: Use python<3.8
> 1924002fd7 Trac #29612: Fix palp issue with -DNDEBUG
> ec976ffd37 Trac #29606: build/pkgs/maxima/spkg-install.in: Do not pass on
> another copy of CFLAGS, LDFLAGS
> d92d65d89f Trac #29601: Fix singular configure patch
> 4256058c21 Trac #29599: Remove C++17 flag from giac and lcalc
> 20f930cead Trac #29598: Make sure latest openblas from conda is used
> 588010006e Trac #29597: Don't override LDFLAGS in m4rie
> 84a3744d65 Trac #29596: Add rpath-link on Linux
> 4f52bf1137 Trac #29621: remove log_html() and other log_*()
> 903edac714 Trac #29607: homebrew-standard: Fix several problems with
> library search paths
> cc17d2e22b Trac #29448: configure finds libpng but matplotlib does not
> 1302e46472 Trac #29269: Add call to cliquer with custom cliques sizes
> 31666f8b04 Trac #29603: wrong self import in skew polynomials
> 990993d2cc Trac #29593: tuning our .lgtm.yml
> 425d099420 Trac #29579: internet test in OEIS failing
> dd2c3bace3 Trac #29578: failing internet test integration
> 876a534f69 Trac #29594: Remove some dead spkg-configure.m4 code
> ee9518ff3e Trac #29591: Don't test whether ppl is an installed package
> d65f415d62 Trac #29587: build/pkgs/glpk/distros/homebrew.txt: Enable glpk
> again
> ba00d2a5a0 Trac #29563: perl_term_readline_gnu spkg-configure depends on
> TERM environment variable
> 1c8196af72 Trac #29561: Don't use imports from rings.all in matrices
> c4d6a67946 Trac #29530: Make Docker images generated by GitHub CI
> workflows available; minor CI fixes
> a4c7371d6a Trac #29390: gf2x build fails on fedora-32-minimal
> cbcab1ad33 Trac #29176: Bug in Voronoi Diagram
> f6d1907e33 Trac #26513: bug in discovery of SRG' complements - related to
> twograph_descendant
> f4d2829903 Trac #26349: Memory leaks with matrix operations over GF(2)
> e080f18c9b Trac #26287: Upgrade to gc 8.0.4 and libatomic 7.6.10
> 97c47d1e61 Trac #29582: polymake SPKG.txt: Remove outdated info regarding
> macOS headers
> c05af490cd Trac #29560: sage-guess-package-system: Ignore conda if no
> environment is activated
> 790f4237bc Trac #27699: configure: Exit with error if an Anaconda
> environment without compilers is active
> be00014c2b Trac #29584: pillow: Add dependencies
> cdc2ccf376 Trac #29574: conda-forge-macos-standard: sage.libs.pynac.pynac
> Symbol not found
> f927058305 Trac #29564: fix some details suggested by lgtm in number
> fields and quaternions
> bb5a3ff819 Trac #29571: build/pkgs/*/distros: Add some missing system
> packages
> 89e63ff18b Trac #29567: Fix "invalid escape sequence" when building the doc
> 715458fd4a Trac #29466: Add kwds to __classcall__ of MatrixSpace
> f1683767f9 Trac #29562: .homebrew-build-env: Set CPATH, LIBRARY_PATH
> instead of CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS
> b5dc372023 Trac #29556: Update README and Installation Guide (from Source)
> for Sage 9.1
> 50c5ac80b0 (tag: 9.1.rc2) Updated SageMath version to 9.1.rc2
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/65b159e0-bdb5-4506-a481-5684b9f2581b%40googlegroups.com.
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-05-06-17-10-32-e2a94497.
Git branch: develop
Using --optional=build,dochtml,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py", line 301, in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_number_field.EllipticCurve_number_field.?
Failed example:
E.simon_two_descent() # long time (4s on sage.math, 2013)
Expected:
(3,
3,
[(0 : 0 : 1),
(-1/2*zeta43_0^2 - 1/2*zeta43_0 + 7 : -3/2*zeta43_0^2 - 5/2*zeta43_0 + 18
: 1)])
Got:
(3,
3,
[(0 : 0 : 1),
(-1/2*zeta43_0^2 - 1/2*zeta43_0 + 7 : -3/2*zeta43_0^2 - 5/2*zeta43_0 + 18
: 1),
(5/8*zeta43_0^2 + 17/8*zeta43_0 - 9/4 : -27/16*zeta43_0^2 -
103/16*zeta43_0 + 39/8 : 1)])
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py", line 812, in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_number_field.EllipticCurve_number_field.global_integral_model
Failed example:
E.global_integral_model()
Expected:
Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 + (2094779518028859*v-1940492905300351)*x*y +
(477997268472544193101178234454165304071127500*v-442791377441346852919930773849502871958097500)*y
= x^3 +
(26519784690047674853185542622500*v-24566525306469707225840460652500)*x^2 over
Number Field in v with defining polynomial x^2 + 161*x - 150
Got:
Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 + (33872485050625*v-31078224284250)*x*y +
(2020602604156076340058146664245468750000*v-1871778534673615560803175189398437500000)*y
= x^3 + (6933305282258321342920781250*v-6422644400723486559914062500)*x^2 over
Number Field in v with defining polynomial x^2 + 161*x - 150
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py", line 924, in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_number_field.EllipticCurve_number_field._scale_by_units
Failed example:
E1.ainvs()
Expected:
(0,
0,
0,
28087920796764302856*a + 88821804456186580548,
-77225139016967233228487820912*a - 244207331916752959911655344864)
Got:
(0,
0,
0,
193309837823322216*a - 611299381639464252,
-3379649566176127326923323632*a + 10687390322316522207588229536)
**********************************************************************
3 items had failures:
1 of 84 in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_number_field.EllipticCurve_number_field.?
1 of 18 in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_number_field.EllipticCurve_number_field._scale_by_units
1 of 19 in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_number_field.EllipticCurve_number_field.global_integral_model
[806 tests, 3 failures, 143.29 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py # 3
doctests failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 143.4 seconds
cpu time: 130.0 seconds
cumulative wall time: 143.3 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-05-06-17-12-58-adc0874c.
Git branch: develop
Using --optional=build,dochtml,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 3426, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.ideals_of_bdd_norm
Failed example:
for n in d:
print(n)
for I in d[n]:
print(I)
Expected:
1
Fractional ideal (1)
2
Fractional ideal (2, 1/2*a - 1/2)
Fractional ideal (2, 1/2*a + 1/2)
3
Fractional ideal (3, 1/2*a - 1/2)
Fractional ideal (3, 1/2*a + 1/2)
4
Fractional ideal (4, 1/2*a + 3/2)
Fractional ideal (2)
Fractional ideal (4, 1/2*a + 5/2)
5
6
Fractional ideal (1/2*a - 1/2)
Fractional ideal (6, 1/2*a + 5/2)
Fractional ideal (6, 1/2*a + 7/2)
Fractional ideal (1/2*a + 1/2)
7
8
Fractional ideal (1/2*a + 3/2)
Fractional ideal (4, a - 1)
Fractional ideal (4, a + 1)
Fractional ideal (1/2*a - 3/2)
9
Fractional ideal (9, 1/2*a + 11/2)
Fractional ideal (3)
Fractional ideal (9, 1/2*a + 7/2)
10
Got:
1
Fractional ideal (1)
2
Fractional ideal (2, 1/2*a - 1/2)
Fractional ideal (2, 1/2*a + 1/2)
3
Fractional ideal (3, 1/2*a + 1/2)
Fractional ideal (3, 1/2*a - 1/2)
4
Fractional ideal (4, 1/2*a + 3/2)
Fractional ideal (2)
Fractional ideal (4, 1/2*a + 5/2)
5
6
Fractional ideal (6, 1/2*a + 7/2)
Fractional ideal (1/2*a + 1/2)
Fractional ideal (1/2*a - 1/2)
Fractional ideal (6, 1/2*a + 5/2)
7
8
Fractional ideal (1/2*a + 3/2)
Fractional ideal (4, a - 1)
Fractional ideal (4, a + 1)
Fractional ideal (1/2*a - 3/2)
9
Fractional ideal (9, 1/2*a + 7/2)
Fractional ideal (3)
Fractional ideal (9, 1/2*a + 11/2)
10
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 4547, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic._S_class_group_and_units
Failed example:
K._S_class_group_and_units(tuple(K.primes_above(13)))
Expected:
([2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 677/13,
1/13*a^2 + 7/13*a - 332/13,
-1/13*a^2 + 6/13*a + 345/13,
-1,
2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 755/13,
1/13*a^2 - 19/13*a - 7/13],
[(Fractional ideal (11, a - 2), 2), (Fractional ideal (19, a + 7), 2)])
Got:
([2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 677/13,
1/13*a^2 + 7/13*a - 332/13,
-1/13*a^2 + 6/13*a + 345/13,
-1,
2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 755/13,
1/13*a^2 + 20/13*a - 7/13],
[(Fractional ideal (11, a - 2), 2), (Fractional ideal (19, a + 7), 2)])
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 4705, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.selmer_group
Failed example:
K.selmer_group(K.primes_above(13), 2)
Expected:
[2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 677/13,
1/13*a^2 + 7/13*a - 332/13,
-1/13*a^2 + 6/13*a + 345/13,
-1,
2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 755/13,
1/13*a^2 - 19/13*a - 7/13,
-1/13*a^2 + 45/13*a - 97/13,
2/13*a^2 + 40/13*a - 27/13]
Got:
[2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 677/13,
1/13*a^2 + 7/13*a - 332/13,
-1/13*a^2 + 6/13*a + 345/13,
-1,
2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 755/13,
1/13*a^2 + 20/13*a - 7/13,
1/13*a^2 - 45/13*a + 97/13,
-2/13*a^2 - 40/13*a + 27/13]
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 5357, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.elements_of_norm
Failed example:
K.elements_of_norm(7)
Expected:
[7/225*a^2 - 7/75*a - 42/25]
Got:
[28/225*a^2 + 77/75*a - 133/25]
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 5460, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.factor
Failed example:
f = L.factor(a + 1); f
Expected:
(Fractional ideal (1/2*a*b - a + 1/2)) * (Fractional ideal (-1/2*a*b - a +
1/2))
Got:
(Fractional ideal (-1/2*b + 1/2*a + 1)) * (Fractional ideal (-1/2*a*b - a +
1/2))
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 6537, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.uniformizer
Failed example:
[K.uniformizer(P) for P,e in factor(K.ideal(7))]
Expected:
[t^2 + 3*t + 1]
Got:
[t^2 - 4*t + 1]
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 7803, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_absolute.optimized_representation
Failed example:
K.optimized_representation()
Expected:
(Number Field in a1 with defining polynomial x^3 - 7*x - 7,
Ring morphism:
From: Number Field in a1 with defining polynomial x^3 - 7*x - 7
To: Number Field in a with defining polynomial 7/9*x^3 + 7/3*x^2 -
56*x + 123
Defn: a1 |--> 7/225*a^2 - 7/75*a - 42/25,
Ring morphism:
From: Number Field in a with defining polynomial 7/9*x^3 + 7/3*x^2 -
56*x + 123
To: Number Field in a1 with defining polynomial x^3 - 7*x - 7
Defn: a |--> -15/7*a1^2 + 9)
Got:
(Number Field in a1 with defining polynomial x^3 - 7*x - 7, Ring morphism:
From: Number Field in a1 with defining polynomial x^3 - 7*x - 7
To: Number Field in a with defining polynomial 7/9*x^3 + 7/3*x^2 -
56*x + 123
Defn: a1 |--> 28/225*a^2 + 77/75*a - 133/25, Ring morphism:
From: Number Field in a with defining polynomial 7/9*x^3 + 7/3*x^2 -
56*x + 123
To: Number Field in a1 with defining polynomial x^3 - 7*x - 7
Defn: a |--> -60/7*a1^2 + 15*a1 + 39)
**********************************************************************
7 items had failures:
1 of 10 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_absolute.optimized_representation
1 of 9 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic._S_class_group_and_units
1 of 6 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.elements_of_norm
1 of 15 in sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.factor
1 of 4 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.ideals_of_bdd_norm
1 of 32 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.selmer_group
1 of 20 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.uniformizer
[2127 tests, 7 failures, 47.41 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py # 7 doctests failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 47.7 seconds
cpu time: 47.2 seconds
cumulative wall time: 47.4 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-05-06-17-13-48-bd830f14.
Git branch: develop
Using --optional=build,dochtml,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx", line 1735, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_element.NumberFieldElement._rnfisnorm
Failed example:
K(17)._rnfisnorm(L)
Expected:
((a^2 - 2)*b - 4, 1)
Got:
((a^2 - 2)*b + 4, 1)
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
1 of 21 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_element.NumberFieldElement._rnfisnorm
[1113 tests, 1 failure, 14.51 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx # 1
doctest failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 14.7 seconds
cpu time: 14.8 seconds
cumulative wall time: 14.5 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-05-06-17-14-05-f52244ed.
Git branch: develop
Using --optional=build,dochtml,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py", line 1826, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_ideal.NumberFieldFractionalIdeal.factor
Failed example:
fact = F.factor(2); fact
Expected:
(Fractional ideal (2*a^2 + 1))^2 * (Fractional ideal (-2*a^2))
Got:
(Fractional ideal (-2*a^2 - 1))^2 * (Fractional ideal (2*a^2))
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py", line 2417, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_ideal.NumberFieldFractionalIdeal.idealcoprime
Failed example:
lam = A.idealcoprime(B); lam
Expected:
-1/6*a + 1/6
Got:
1/6*a - 1/6
**********************************************************************
2 items had failures:
1 of 10 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_ideal.NumberFieldFractionalIdeal.factor
1 of 7 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_ideal.NumberFieldFractionalIdeal.idealcoprime
[674 tests, 2 failures, 4.52 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py # 2 doctests
failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 4.6 seconds
cpu time: 4.4 seconds
cumulative wall time: 4.5 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-05-06-17-14-12-b153bca0.
Git branch: develop
Using --optional=build,dochtml,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/lfunctions/dokchitser.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/lfunctions/dokchitser.py", line 112, in
sage.lfunctions.dokchitser.Dokchitser
Failed example:
L.check_functional_equation()
Expected:
6.04442711160669e-18
Got:
6.11218974738703e-18
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/lfunctions/dokchitser.py", line 671, in
sage.lfunctions.dokchitser.Dokchitser.check_functional_equation
Failed example:
L.check_functional_equation()
Expected:
-2.71050543121376e-20
Got:
-1.35525271560688e-20
**********************************************************************
2 items had failures:
1 of 39 in sage.lfunctions.dokchitser.Dokchitser
1 of 5 in sage.lfunctions.dokchitser.Dokchitser.check_functional_equation
[96 tests, 2 failures, 2.03 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/lfunctions/dokchitser.py # 2 doctests failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 2.1 seconds
cpu time: 0.7 seconds
cumulative wall time: 2.0 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-05-06-17-14-17-7e087b2e.
Git branch: develop
Using --optional=build,dochtml,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx", line 2287, in
sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges
Failed example:
p.print_ranges()
Expected:
glp_print_ranges: optimal basic solution required
1
Got:
1
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
1 of 13 in sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges
[554 tests, 1 failure, 3.71 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx # 1 doctest failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 3.8 seconds
cpu time: 3.7 seconds
cumulative wall time: 3.7 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-05-06-17-14-23-edbaf368.
Git branch: develop
Using --optional=build,dochtml,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py", line 1284, in
sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_quotient_ring.PolynomialQuotientRing_generic.S_class_group
Failed example:
S.S_class_group([])
Expected:
[((1/4*xbar^2 + 31/4,
(-1/8*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/8*a + 31/8,
1/16*xbar^3 + 1/16*xbar^2 + 31/16*xbar + 31/16,
-1/16*a*xbar^3 + (1/16*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/16*a*xbar + 31/16*a + 31/8),
6),
((-1/4*xbar^2 - 23/4,
(1/8*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/8*a - 23/8,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 1/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 23/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 + (-1/16*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a - 23/8),
6),
((-5/4*xbar^2 - 115/4,
1/4*a*xbar^2 + 23/4*a,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 7/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 161/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 - 1/16*a*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a),
2)]
Got:
[((1/4*xbar^2 + 31/4,
(-1/8*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/8*a + 31/8,
1/16*xbar^3 + 1/16*xbar^2 + 31/16*xbar + 31/16,
-1/16*a*xbar^3 + (1/16*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/16*a*xbar + 31/16*a + 31/8),
6),
((-1/4*xbar^2 - 23/4,
(1/8*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/8*a - 23/8,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 1/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 23/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 + (-1/16*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a - 23/8),
6),
((-5/4*xbar^2 - 115/4,
(1/8*a - 5/8)*xbar^2 + 23/8*a - 115/8,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 17/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 391/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 + (-1/16*a - 5/8)*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a - 115/8),
2)]
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py", line 1416, in
sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_quotient_ring.PolynomialQuotientRing_generic.class_group
Failed example:
S.class_group()
Expected:
[((1/4*xbar^2 + 31/4,
(-1/8*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/8*a + 31/8,
1/16*xbar^3 + 1/16*xbar^2 + 31/16*xbar + 31/16,
-1/16*a*xbar^3 + (1/16*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/16*a*xbar + 31/16*a + 31/8),
6),
((-1/4*xbar^2 - 23/4,
(1/8*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/8*a - 23/8,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 1/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 23/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 + (-1/16*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a - 23/8),
6),
((-5/4*xbar^2 - 115/4,
1/4*a*xbar^2 + 23/4*a,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 7/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 161/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 - 1/16*a*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a),
2)]
Got:
[((1/4*xbar^2 + 31/4,
(-1/8*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/8*a + 31/8,
1/16*xbar^3 + 1/16*xbar^2 + 31/16*xbar + 31/16,
-1/16*a*xbar^3 + (1/16*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/16*a*xbar + 31/16*a + 31/8),
6),
((-1/4*xbar^2 - 23/4,
(1/8*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/8*a - 23/8,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 1/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 23/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 + (-1/16*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a - 23/8),
6),
((-5/4*xbar^2 - 115/4,
(1/8*a - 5/8)*xbar^2 + 23/8*a - 115/8,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 17/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 391/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 + (-1/16*a - 5/8)*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a - 115/8),
2)]
**********************************************************************
2 items had failures:
1 of 22 in
sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_quotient_ring.PolynomialQuotientRing_generic.S_class_group
1 of 26 in
sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_quotient_ring.PolynomialQuotientRing_generic.class_group
[482 tests, 2 failures, 1.71 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py # 2
doctests failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 1.8 seconds
cpu time: 1.7 seconds
cumulative wall time: 1.7 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-05-06-17-14-27-3fb4b415.
Git branch: develop
Using --optional=build,dochtml,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/lfunctions/pari.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/lfunctions/pari.py", line 425, in sage.lfunctions.pari.LFunction
Failed example:
L.check_functional_equation()
Expected:
1.08420217248550e-19
Got:
4.33680868994202e-19
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
1 of 28 in sage.lfunctions.pari.LFunction
[162 tests, 1 failure, 1.15 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/lfunctions/pari.py # 1 doctest failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 6.2 seconds
cpu time: 1.1 seconds
cumulative wall time: 1.2 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-05-06-17-14-36-0368e318.
Git branch: develop
Using --optional=build,dochtml,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx", line 100, in
sage.libs.glpk.error.setup_glpk_error_handler
Failed example:
res = p.solve()
Expected:
0: obj = ...
Got:
<BLANKLINE>
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
1 of 11 in sage.libs.glpk.error.setup_glpk_error_handler
[12 tests, 1 failure, 0.82 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx # 1 doctest failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 0.8 seconds
cpu time: 0.4 seconds
cumulative wall time: 0.8 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-05-06-17-14-39-fee15a1d.
Git branch: develop
Using --optional=build,dochtml,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/unit_group.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/unit_group.py", line 281, in
sage.rings.number_field.unit_group.UnitGroup.__init__
Failed example:
UnitGroup(K, S=tuple(K.primes_above(7)))
Expected:
S-unit group with structure C2 x Z x Z x Z of Number Field in a with
defining polynomial 7/9*x^3 + 7/3*x^2 - 56*x + 123 with S = (Fractional ideal
(7/225*a^2 - 7/75*a - 42/25),)
Got:
S-unit group with structure C2 x Z x Z x Z of Number Field in a with
defining polynomial 7/9*x^3 + 7/3*x^2 - 56*x + 123 with S = (Fractional ideal
(28/225*a^2 + 77/75*a - 133/25),)
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
1 of 23 in sage.rings.number_field.unit_group.UnitGroup.__init__
[176 tests, 1 failure, 0.92 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/unit_group.py # 1 doctest failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 1.0 seconds
cpu time: 0.9 seconds
cumulative wall time: 0.9 seconds
