On Debian testing running o core i7 + 16 GB RAM, pulling Trac#28656
<https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28656> on top of a 9.1 rebuilt from make
distclean (using all the system packages ecommended by ./config) leads to
11 failures (and 1 timeout, which doesn’t when ran standalone) :
File Result P/T
src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py 3 doctests failed P
src/sage/tests/parigp.py Timed out T
src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py 7 doctests failed P
src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx 1 doctest failed P
src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py 2 doctests failed P
src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py 1 doctest failed P
src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx 1 doctest failed P
src/sage/lfunctions/dokchitser.py 2 doctests failed P
src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py 2 doctests failed P
src/sage/lfunctions/pari.py 1 doctest failed P
src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx 1 doctest failed P
src/sage/rings/number_field/unit_group.py 1 doctest failed P
The result of re-running these failures is in the attached chkerrs.txt.
Most of these errors were reported
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-release/4spsDgdYoYA/O1ZjI5VLBgAJ> for
9.1.rc3, and explained away
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-release/4spsDgdYoYA/CS8T3x4gBwAJ> by
Jonathan Kliem. One of them is related to the optional gap_packages package.
HTH,
Le jeudi 28 mai 2020 23:14:41 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
>
> 860e4dc988 (tag: 9.2.beta0, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to
> 9.2.beta0
> 982d86df0e Trac #29673: spkg-configure.m4 for sympow
> 84397a0a52 Trac #29666: Serious precision problems with heights of
> elliptic curve points over number fields
> 7c71fc3bb1 Trac #29664: get rid of _cmp_ for symbolic expression
> 2ebe6e5ce0 Trac #29661: Some optimizations for method regions of
> hyperplane arrangements
> c22ec6f190 Trac #29660: Move radius, diameter and eccentricity methods
> from generic_graph.py to graph.py and digraph.py
> 4863459703 Trac #29658: Update to BRiAl 1.2.8
> 9f40d8adee Trac #29656: some gentoo distro info missing
> c13e69bf01 Trac #29652: Implement polynomial subresultants
> 19c8e9cd11 Trac #29645: precision bug in elliptic curve periods (complex
> embeddings)
> cc00c8b1cc Trac #29639: Bug in initialization of vector field with
> rational components
> 11021ec846 Trac #29628: Wedge product of multivector field with scalar
> field
> 655efd7377 Trac #29611: Direct sum for genus symbols
> b42128bed1 Trac #29569: Obtain polar with both Vrep and Hrep (if backend
> supports it)
> e51ad078ce Trac #29568: Initialize polyhedra with backend cdd over RDF
> with both Vrepresentation and Hrepresentation
> 6de31119d9 Trac #29469: Have method is_unit of QuotientRingElement and
> PolynomialQuotientRingElement return True in more cases
> 5bd59a4d82 Trac #29432: Improve Localization
> 64efc5e6b4 Trac #29098: Merge build/make/deps into build/make/Makefile.in
> 10e548884f Trac #29565: Migrate neighborly to combinatorial polyhedron
> fbb11c3130 Trac #29502: spkg-configure for suitesparse
> 36f3858397 Trac #29476: Improvement on numerical modular symbols
> e88dfc8837 Trac #29414: Add representation class to docs
> 58f004f5de Trac #28913: integrate(..., algorithm="giac"): Incorrect
> conversion to Sage
> df2bc13235 Trac #28000: For Sage 9.2: Remove python 2 support from sagelib
> 9e34d8ff0b Trac #22713: Multiple zeta algebra
> 805ee2a9f3 Trac #20317: bug in Permutations_msetk cardinality
> 3c892146f1 Trac #29648: Update src/doc/en/faq
> 4d756290d4 Trac #29636: Delete changelog sections from all SPKG.txt files
> e30cbf5114 Trac #29572: Fix perl_term_readline_gnu build error on
> conda-forge-macos-maximal
> 4427340fcd (tag: 9.1, trac/master) Updated SageMath version to 9.1
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/43e88ee2-a397-465b-b4bd-9f3d0973af96%40googlegroups.com.
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-06-01-18-47-52-77e966fb.
Git branch: tst28656
Using
--optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py", line 300, in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_number_field.EllipticCurve_number_field.?
Failed example:
E.simon_two_descent() # long time (4s on sage.math, 2013)
Expected:
(3,
3,
[(0 : 0 : 1),
(-1/2*zeta43_0^2 - 1/2*zeta43_0 + 7 : -3/2*zeta43_0^2 - 5/2*zeta43_0 + 18
: 1)])
Got:
(3,
3,
[(0 : 0 : 1),
(-1/2*zeta43_0^2 - 1/2*zeta43_0 + 7 : -3/2*zeta43_0^2 - 5/2*zeta43_0 + 18
: 1),
(5/8*zeta43_0^2 + 17/8*zeta43_0 - 9/4 : -27/16*zeta43_0^2 -
103/16*zeta43_0 + 39/8 : 1)])
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py", line 811, in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_number_field.EllipticCurve_number_field.global_integral_model
Failed example:
E.global_integral_model()
Expected:
Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 + (2094779518028859*v-1940492905300351)*x*y +
(477997268472544193101178234454165304071127500*v-442791377441346852919930773849502871958097500)*y
= x^3 +
(26519784690047674853185542622500*v-24566525306469707225840460652500)*x^2 over
Number Field in v with defining polynomial x^2 + 161*x - 150
Got:
Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 + (33872485050625*v-31078224284250)*x*y +
(2020602604156076340058146664245468750000*v-1871778534673615560803175189398437500000)*y
= x^3 + (6933305282258321342920781250*v-6422644400723486559914062500)*x^2 over
Number Field in v with defining polynomial x^2 + 161*x - 150
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py", line 920, in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_number_field.EllipticCurve_number_field._scale_by_units
Failed example:
E1.ainvs()
Expected:
(0,
0,
0,
28087920796764302856*a + 88821804456186580548,
-77225139016967233228487820912*a - 244207331916752959911655344864)
Got:
(0,
0,
0,
193309837823322216*a - 611299381639464252,
-3379649566176127326923323632*a + 10687390322316522207588229536)
**********************************************************************
3 items had failures:
1 of 84 in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_number_field.EllipticCurve_number_field.?
1 of 18 in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_number_field.EllipticCurve_number_field._scale_by_units
1 of 19 in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_number_field.EllipticCurve_number_field.global_integral_model
[806 tests, 3 failures, 144.31 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py # 3
doctests failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 144.5 seconds
cpu time: 130.1 seconds
cumulative wall time: 144.3 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-06-01-18-50-20-5bc547e2.
Git branch: tst28656
Using
--optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/tests/parigp.py
[13 tests, 618.16 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All tests passed!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 618.2 seconds
cpu time: 616.3 seconds
cumulative wall time: 618.2 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-06-01-19-00-41-43fb7998.
Git branch: tst28656
Using
--optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 3424, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.ideals_of_bdd_norm
Failed example:
for n in d:
print(n)
for I in d[n]:
print(I)
Expected:
1
Fractional ideal (1)
2
Fractional ideal (2, 1/2*a - 1/2)
Fractional ideal (2, 1/2*a + 1/2)
3
Fractional ideal (3, 1/2*a - 1/2)
Fractional ideal (3, 1/2*a + 1/2)
4
Fractional ideal (4, 1/2*a + 3/2)
Fractional ideal (2)
Fractional ideal (4, 1/2*a + 5/2)
5
6
Fractional ideal (1/2*a - 1/2)
Fractional ideal (6, 1/2*a + 5/2)
Fractional ideal (6, 1/2*a + 7/2)
Fractional ideal (1/2*a + 1/2)
7
8
Fractional ideal (1/2*a + 3/2)
Fractional ideal (4, a - 1)
Fractional ideal (4, a + 1)
Fractional ideal (1/2*a - 3/2)
9
Fractional ideal (9, 1/2*a + 11/2)
Fractional ideal (3)
Fractional ideal (9, 1/2*a + 7/2)
10
Got:
1
Fractional ideal (1)
2
Fractional ideal (2, 1/2*a - 1/2)
Fractional ideal (2, 1/2*a + 1/2)
3
Fractional ideal (3, 1/2*a + 1/2)
Fractional ideal (3, 1/2*a - 1/2)
4
Fractional ideal (4, 1/2*a + 3/2)
Fractional ideal (2)
Fractional ideal (4, 1/2*a + 5/2)
5
6
Fractional ideal (6, 1/2*a + 7/2)
Fractional ideal (1/2*a + 1/2)
Fractional ideal (1/2*a - 1/2)
Fractional ideal (6, 1/2*a + 5/2)
7
8
Fractional ideal (1/2*a + 3/2)
Fractional ideal (4, a - 1)
Fractional ideal (4, a + 1)
Fractional ideal (1/2*a - 3/2)
9
Fractional ideal (9, 1/2*a + 7/2)
Fractional ideal (3)
Fractional ideal (9, 1/2*a + 11/2)
10
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 4545, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic._S_class_group_and_units
Failed example:
K._S_class_group_and_units(tuple(K.primes_above(13)))
Expected:
([2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 677/13,
1/13*a^2 + 7/13*a - 332/13,
-1/13*a^2 + 6/13*a + 345/13,
-1,
2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 755/13,
1/13*a^2 - 19/13*a - 7/13],
[(Fractional ideal (11, a - 2), 2), (Fractional ideal (19, a + 7), 2)])
Got:
([2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 677/13,
1/13*a^2 + 7/13*a - 332/13,
-1/13*a^2 + 6/13*a + 345/13,
-1,
2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 755/13,
1/13*a^2 + 20/13*a - 7/13],
[(Fractional ideal (11, a - 2), 2), (Fractional ideal (19, a + 7), 2)])
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 4703, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.selmer_group
Failed example:
K.selmer_group(K.primes_above(13), 2)
Expected:
[2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 677/13,
1/13*a^2 + 7/13*a - 332/13,
-1/13*a^2 + 6/13*a + 345/13,
-1,
2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 755/13,
1/13*a^2 - 19/13*a - 7/13,
-1/13*a^2 + 45/13*a - 97/13,
2/13*a^2 + 40/13*a - 27/13]
Got:
[2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 677/13,
1/13*a^2 + 7/13*a - 332/13,
-1/13*a^2 + 6/13*a + 345/13,
-1,
2/13*a^2 + 1/13*a - 755/13,
1/13*a^2 + 20/13*a - 7/13,
1/13*a^2 - 45/13*a + 97/13,
-2/13*a^2 - 40/13*a + 27/13]
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 5355, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.elements_of_norm
Failed example:
K.elements_of_norm(7)
Expected:
[7/225*a^2 - 7/75*a - 42/25]
Got:
[28/225*a^2 + 77/75*a - 133/25]
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 5458, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.factor
Failed example:
f = L.factor(a + 1); f
Expected:
(Fractional ideal (1/2*a*b - a + 1/2)) * (Fractional ideal (-1/2*a*b - a +
1/2))
Got:
(Fractional ideal (-1/2*b + 1/2*a + 1)) * (Fractional ideal (-1/2*a*b - a +
1/2))
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 6535, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.uniformizer
Failed example:
[K.uniformizer(P) for P,e in factor(K.ideal(7))]
Expected:
[t^2 + 3*t + 1]
Got:
[t^2 - 4*t + 1]
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py", line 7801, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_absolute.optimized_representation
Failed example:
K.optimized_representation()
Expected:
(Number Field in a1 with defining polynomial x^3 - 7*x - 7,
Ring morphism:
From: Number Field in a1 with defining polynomial x^3 - 7*x - 7
To: Number Field in a with defining polynomial 7/9*x^3 + 7/3*x^2 -
56*x + 123
Defn: a1 |--> 7/225*a^2 - 7/75*a - 42/25,
Ring morphism:
From: Number Field in a with defining polynomial 7/9*x^3 + 7/3*x^2 -
56*x + 123
To: Number Field in a1 with defining polynomial x^3 - 7*x - 7
Defn: a |--> -15/7*a1^2 + 9)
Got:
(Number Field in a1 with defining polynomial x^3 - 7*x - 7, Ring morphism:
From: Number Field in a1 with defining polynomial x^3 - 7*x - 7
To: Number Field in a with defining polynomial 7/9*x^3 + 7/3*x^2 -
56*x + 123
Defn: a1 |--> 28/225*a^2 + 77/75*a - 133/25, Ring morphism:
From: Number Field in a with defining polynomial 7/9*x^3 + 7/3*x^2 -
56*x + 123
To: Number Field in a1 with defining polynomial x^3 - 7*x - 7
Defn: a |--> -60/7*a1^2 + 15*a1 + 39)
**********************************************************************
7 items had failures:
1 of 10 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_absolute.optimized_representation
1 of 9 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic._S_class_group_and_units
1 of 6 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.elements_of_norm
1 of 15 in sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.factor
1 of 4 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.ideals_of_bdd_norm
1 of 32 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.selmer_group
1 of 20 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_generic.uniformizer
[2127 tests, 7 failures, 47.86 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py # 7 doctests failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 48.3 seconds
cpu time: 47.5 seconds
cumulative wall time: 47.9 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-06-01-19-01-31-987b71a0.
Git branch: tst28656
Using
--optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx", line 1735, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_element.NumberFieldElement._rnfisnorm
Failed example:
K(17)._rnfisnorm(L)
Expected:
((a^2 - 2)*b - 4, 1)
Got:
((a^2 - 2)*b + 4, 1)
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
1 of 21 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_element.NumberFieldElement._rnfisnorm
[1113 tests, 1 failure, 15.68 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx # 1
doctest failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 15.9 seconds
cpu time: 15.5 seconds
cumulative wall time: 15.7 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-06-01-19-01-50-b6a9b01f.
Git branch: tst28656
Using
--optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py", line 1825, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_ideal.NumberFieldFractionalIdeal.factor
Failed example:
fact = F.factor(2); fact
Expected:
(Fractional ideal (2*a^2 + 1))^2 * (Fractional ideal (-2*a^2))
Got:
(Fractional ideal (-2*a^2 - 1))^2 * (Fractional ideal (2*a^2))
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py", line 2416, in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_ideal.NumberFieldFractionalIdeal.idealcoprime
Failed example:
lam = A.idealcoprime(B); lam
Expected:
-1/6*a + 1/6
Got:
1/6*a - 1/6
**********************************************************************
2 items had failures:
1 of 10 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_ideal.NumberFieldFractionalIdeal.factor
1 of 7 in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_ideal.NumberFieldFractionalIdeal.idealcoprime
[674 tests, 2 failures, 4.27 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py # 2 doctests
failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 4.4 seconds
cpu time: 4.3 seconds
cumulative wall time: 4.3 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-06-01-19-01-56-ac899978.
Git branch: tst28656
Using
--optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py", line 8, in sage.tests.gap_packages
Failed example:
test_packages(pkgs, only_failures=True) # optional - gap_packages
Expected:
Status Package GAP Output
+--------+---------+------------+
Got:
#I method installed for Matrix matches more than one declaration
Status Package GAP Output
+--------+---------+------------+
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
1 of 5 in sage.tests.gap_packages
[11 tests, 1 failure, 3.30 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py # 1 doctest failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 3.3 seconds
cpu time: 2.9 seconds
cumulative wall time: 3.3 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-06-01-19-02-02-0869eac3.
Git branch: tst28656
Using
--optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx", line 2287, in
sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges
Failed example:
p.print_ranges()
Expected:
glp_print_ranges: optimal basic solution required
1
Got:
1
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
1 of 13 in sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges
[554 tests, 1 failure, 3.75 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx # 1 doctest failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 3.9 seconds
cpu time: 3.8 seconds
cumulative wall time: 3.8 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-06-01-19-02-08-b4a847d9.
Git branch: tst28656
Using
--optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/lfunctions/dokchitser.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/lfunctions/dokchitser.py", line 112, in
sage.lfunctions.dokchitser.Dokchitser
Failed example:
L.check_functional_equation()
Expected:
6.04442711160669e-18
Got:
6.11218974738703e-18
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/lfunctions/dokchitser.py", line 671, in
sage.lfunctions.dokchitser.Dokchitser.check_functional_equation
Failed example:
L.check_functional_equation()
Expected:
-2.71050543121376e-20
Got:
-1.35525271560688e-20
**********************************************************************
2 items had failures:
1 of 39 in sage.lfunctions.dokchitser.Dokchitser
1 of 5 in sage.lfunctions.dokchitser.Dokchitser.check_functional_equation
[96 tests, 2 failures, 2.05 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/lfunctions/dokchitser.py # 2 doctests failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 2.1 seconds
cpu time: 0.7 seconds
cumulative wall time: 2.0 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-06-01-19-02-13-1ece3a68.
Git branch: tst28656
Using
--optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py", line 1282, in
sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_quotient_ring.PolynomialQuotientRing_generic.S_class_group
Failed example:
S.S_class_group([])
Expected:
[((1/4*xbar^2 + 31/4,
(-1/8*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/8*a + 31/8,
1/16*xbar^3 + 1/16*xbar^2 + 31/16*xbar + 31/16,
-1/16*a*xbar^3 + (1/16*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/16*a*xbar + 31/16*a + 31/8),
6),
((-1/4*xbar^2 - 23/4,
(1/8*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/8*a - 23/8,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 1/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 23/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 + (-1/16*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a - 23/8),
6),
((-5/4*xbar^2 - 115/4,
1/4*a*xbar^2 + 23/4*a,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 7/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 161/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 - 1/16*a*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a),
2)]
Got:
[((1/4*xbar^2 + 31/4,
(-1/8*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/8*a + 31/8,
1/16*xbar^3 + 1/16*xbar^2 + 31/16*xbar + 31/16,
-1/16*a*xbar^3 + (1/16*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/16*a*xbar + 31/16*a + 31/8),
6),
((-1/4*xbar^2 - 23/4,
(1/8*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/8*a - 23/8,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 1/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 23/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 + (-1/16*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a - 23/8),
6),
((-5/4*xbar^2 - 115/4,
(1/8*a - 5/8)*xbar^2 + 23/8*a - 115/8,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 17/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 391/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 + (-1/16*a - 5/8)*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a - 115/8),
2)]
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py", line 1414, in
sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_quotient_ring.PolynomialQuotientRing_generic.class_group
Failed example:
S.class_group()
Expected:
[((1/4*xbar^2 + 31/4,
(-1/8*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/8*a + 31/8,
1/16*xbar^3 + 1/16*xbar^2 + 31/16*xbar + 31/16,
-1/16*a*xbar^3 + (1/16*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/16*a*xbar + 31/16*a + 31/8),
6),
((-1/4*xbar^2 - 23/4,
(1/8*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/8*a - 23/8,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 1/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 23/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 + (-1/16*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a - 23/8),
6),
((-5/4*xbar^2 - 115/4,
1/4*a*xbar^2 + 23/4*a,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 7/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 161/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 - 1/16*a*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a),
2)]
Got:
[((1/4*xbar^2 + 31/4,
(-1/8*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/8*a + 31/8,
1/16*xbar^3 + 1/16*xbar^2 + 31/16*xbar + 31/16,
-1/16*a*xbar^3 + (1/16*a + 1/8)*xbar^2 - 31/16*a*xbar + 31/16*a + 31/8),
6),
((-1/4*xbar^2 - 23/4,
(1/8*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/8*a - 23/8,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 1/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 23/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 + (-1/16*a - 1/8)*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a - 23/8),
6),
((-5/4*xbar^2 - 115/4,
(1/8*a - 5/8)*xbar^2 + 23/8*a - 115/8,
-1/16*xbar^3 - 17/16*xbar^2 - 23/16*xbar - 391/16,
1/16*a*xbar^3 + (-1/16*a - 5/8)*xbar^2 + 23/16*a*xbar - 23/16*a - 115/8),
2)]
**********************************************************************
2 items had failures:
1 of 22 in
sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_quotient_ring.PolynomialQuotientRing_generic.S_class_group
1 of 26 in
sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_quotient_ring.PolynomialQuotientRing_generic.class_group
[482 tests, 2 failures, 2.03 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py # 2
doctests failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 2.1 seconds
cpu time: 2.0 seconds
cumulative wall time: 2.0 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-06-01-19-02-18-64b6f252.
Git branch: tst28656
Using
--optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/lfunctions/pari.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/lfunctions/pari.py", line 425, in sage.lfunctions.pari.LFunction
Failed example:
L.check_functional_equation()
Expected:
1.08420217248550e-19
Got:
4.33680868994202e-19
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
1 of 28 in sage.lfunctions.pari.LFunction
[162 tests, 1 failure, 2.61 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/lfunctions/pari.py # 1 doctest failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 7.7 seconds
cpu time: 2.5 seconds
cumulative wall time: 2.6 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-06-01-19-02-28-c5d7e4ac.
Git branch: tst28656
Using
--optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx", line 100, in
sage.libs.glpk.error.setup_glpk_error_handler
Failed example:
res = p.solve()
Expected:
0: obj = ...
Got:
<BLANKLINE>
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
1 of 11 in sage.libs.glpk.error.setup_glpk_error_handler
[12 tests, 1 failure, 0.95 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx # 1 doctest failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 1.0 seconds
cpu time: 0.5 seconds
cumulative wall time: 0.9 seconds
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2020-06-01-19-02-32-15540720.
Git branch: tst28656
Using
--optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,sage
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/unit_group.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/rings/number_field/unit_group.py", line 281, in
sage.rings.number_field.unit_group.UnitGroup.__init__
Failed example:
UnitGroup(K, S=tuple(K.primes_above(7)))
Expected:
S-unit group with structure C2 x Z x Z x Z of Number Field in a with
defining polynomial 7/9*x^3 + 7/3*x^2 - 56*x + 123 with S = (Fractional ideal
(7/225*a^2 - 7/75*a - 42/25),)
Got:
S-unit group with structure C2 x Z x Z x Z of Number Field in a with
defining polynomial 7/9*x^3 + 7/3*x^2 - 56*x + 123 with S = (Fractional ideal
(28/225*a^2 + 77/75*a - 133/25),)
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
1 of 23 in sage.rings.number_field.unit_group.UnitGroup.__init__
[176 tests, 1 failure, 1.02 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/unit_group.py # 1 doctest failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 1.1 seconds
cpu time: 1.0 seconds
cumulative wall time: 1.0 seconds
