Fix at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34037 is ready for review.

> On 21/06/2022, at 13:13, François Bissey <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The test was introduced in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25626 and you can 
> see my comment at the end. We need to follow up to make sure the result is 
> tested in a more version independent form.
> 
>> On 21/06/2022, at 13:08, François Bissey <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I meant to follow up on that. The test has been added in a recent ticket but 
>> the result is different between giac 1.7 and giac 1.9. Both results are 
>> equivalent but the 1.7 is more compact (simplified?). The failure means you 
>> have giac 1.9 installed.
>> 
>>> On 21/06/2022, at 13:05, '[email protected]' via sage-release 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I don't know when these errors started to appear, but I am getting the 
>>> following failures:
>>> 
>>> Using 
>>> --optional=4ti2,bliss,coxeter3,debian,e_antic,fricas,gap_packages,latte_int,libsemigroups,lidia,meataxe,normaliz,pip,sage,sage_spkg,tides
>>> Features to be detected: 
>>> 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
>>> Doctesting 2 files using 24 threads.
>>> sage -t --warn-long 41.4 
>>> --random-seed=318832280051652493374019680328048210704 
>>> src/sage/calculus/calculus.py
>>> **********************************************************************
>>> File "src/sage/calculus/calculus.py", line 387, in sage.calculus.calculus
>>> Failed example:
>>>   integrate(exp(t)/(t + 1)^2, t, algorithm="giac")
>>> Expected:
>>>   (t*Ei(t + 1) + Ei(t + 1) - e^(t + 1))/(t*e + e)
>>> Got:
>>>   ((t + 1)*(1/(t + 1) - 1)*Ei(-(t + 1)*(1/(t + 1) - 1) + 1) - Ei(-(t + 
>>> 1)*(1/(t + 1) - 1) + 1) + e^(-(t + 1)*(1/(t + 1) - 1) + 1))/((t + 1)*(1/(t 
>>> + 1) - 1)*e - e)
>>> **********************************************************************
>> 
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/25F4C557-7749-4FC4-97F5-D12D35932ECA%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to