On Tuesday, November 26, 2024 at 8:45:37 PM UTC+9 Dima Pasechnik wrote:

no, I have not yet opened a PR to fix it.


The PR should be a blocker.
 

It was added in the PR which upgraded gcc - as it failed to build ecm on a 
macOS system (sic!)


On macOS,  I think it is the usual scenario that the system gcc(clang) is 
used to build sage. 

We should just get rid of the gcc package, it is merely a source of bugs 
and a general development timesink.


I am aware that this issue is controversial. But I am no expert in that.

If, on every platform we support, the system gcc is a prerequisite and 
enough to build sage, and to compile cython code in sage sessions, then I 
see no reason for us to carry the gcc package. I wonder what are the main 
arguments against it though.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/555ee36c-24e9-4d6c-b471-91b0f101d236n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to