On 10/30/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A remark: I just noticed that the leopard binary is about 53 mb > > smaller than the tiger binary, and that seems to indicate that > > something went wrong with the tiger binary. > > > > Arrg, obviously the problem seems to be with the leopard binary, not > the tiger one. I also noticed that the binaries have not been mirrored > out to sage.math yet. > > Sorry for the double post,
OK, I've removed the Leopard binary to avoid confusion. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
